From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:15:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:15:26 -0400 Received: from server1.cosmoslink.net ([208.179.167.101]:37449 "EHLO server1.cosmoslink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:15:15 -0400 Message-ID: <011501c0e6d8$ec93af80$4aa6b3d0@Toshiba> From: "Jaswinder Singh" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?= Cc: , , "Jaswinder Singh" In-Reply-To: <01052622193100.01317@linux.zuhause.de> <00a101c0e642$4f0791a0$52a6b3d0@Toshiba> <20010527183207.B21206@unthought.net> Subject: Re: IDE Performance lack ! Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 11:14:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Jakob Østergaard" wrote : > > The answer for both of you is: > > hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever} > > Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually pretty > good without DMA ;) > i think DMA or PCI is not my solution , atleast :) Thank you, Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di.