Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel

["shiva g" <shiva@isofttech.com>]

Here is the source

static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_device_bh(struct usb_device_instance 
*device)
{
    if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && 
!device->device_bh.sync) {
        queue_task(&device->device_bh, &tq_immediate);
        mark_bh(IMMEDIATE_BH);
    }
}

Also,in the below code, will replacing "schedule_task" simply by 
"schedule_work" work?
static __inline__ void usbd_schedule_function_bh(struct usb_device_instance 
*device)
{
    if (device && (device->status != USBD_CLOSING) && 
!device->function_bh.sync) {
    schedule_task(&device->function_bh);
    }

---- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sam Ravnborg" <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "shiva g" <shiva@isofttech.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: mark_bh in Linux 2.6.12 kernel


> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:12:43PM +0530, shiva g wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>    We are porting a usb host controller driver from 2.4.18 kernel to 
>> 2.6.12
>> kernel. We face some issues with
>> mark_bh( ) call. Can anyone suggest us how we proceed in porting 
>> mark_bh( )
>> in the 2.6.12 kernel.
> Posting the source may give you more/better feedback...
>
> Sam
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/