Re: [PATCH 3/3] iio: adc: adc128s052: Support ROHM BD7910[0,1,2,3]

[David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>]

On 8/14/25 3:35 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> The ROHM BD79100, BD79101, BD79102, BD79103 are very similar ADCs as the
> ROHM BD79104. The BD79100 has only 1 channel. BD79101 has 2 channels and
> the BD79102 has 4 channels. Both BD79103 and BD79104 have 4 channels,
> and, based on the data sheets, they seem identical from the software
> point-of-view.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
> 
> ---

One small suggestion. With that:

Reviewed-by: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>

> ---
>  drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> index 81153253529e..2f2ed438cf4e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-adc128s052.c
> @@ -122,6 +122,10 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec adc124s021_channels[] = {
>  	ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(3),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct iio_chan_spec bd79100_channels[] = {

Even though the driver doesn't support it yet, there is a
adc121s021 [1] so would be nice to use that instead of bd79100
to keep the naming consistent.

[1]: https://www.ti.com/product/ADC121C021

> +	ADC128_VOLTAGE_CHANNEL(0),
> +};
> +