From: vsnsdualce@memeware.net
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org,
misc@openbsd.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CoC loving Linux programmers... is completely on topic.
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2019 23:07:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <014598109c6272575635449ed6d6df3d@memeware.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_mbwDEr6BdQ=BBCKA+UPhQOBoTHPheM6eXvdrgHf7s2bg@mail.gmail.com>
Funny, the pro-CoC developers claim any discussion is off-topic on the
linux developer lists.
The licensing of linux-kernel is completely on topic, since there may
be linux-copyright-holders reading this list.
They have been told they have no rights, that they transferred them
away.
This is a complete lie.
They have only magnanimously granted a license to use their code.
They have received nothing for it.
It is a gratuitous license given by them.
They can rescind this license from whomever they want at any time.
Including the linux kernel project.
> This
> is being resolved off-list shortly.
Some veiled threat?
Because you do not like my way of speaking, or the topic?
You want the property-owners to be dispossessed?
On 2019-01-01 20:49, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 3:44 PM Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Question. Why are these license discussions being done on a USER list
>> instead of a DEVELOPER list? Gentoo has mailing lists that are to be
>> used for this sort of topic. How about taking them there? Here is a
>> link with them listed.
>>
>
> This is indeed off-topic for this list (and other Gentoo lists). This
> is being resolved off-list shortly.
>
> I appreciate everybody's ongoing patience with not replying.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-01 23:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-31 2:07 CoC loving Linux programmers swear the GPLv2 is irrevocable. They are wrong. (As are the women they wish to empower) vnsndalce
2018-12-31 8:45 ` Ivan Ivanov
2019-01-01 19:31 ` vnsndalce
[not found] ` <q0fn2v$q4j$1@blaine.gmane.org>
2019-01-01 20:16 ` vsnsdualce
[not found] ` <8cbdc777-07c9-fe50-7708-22ffcbfb5669@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAGfcS_mbwDEr6BdQ=BBCKA+UPhQOBoTHPheM6eXvdrgHf7s2bg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-01-01 23:07 ` vsnsdualce [this message]
2019-01-01 22:58 ` Yes you can rescind. " vsnsdualce
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=014598109c6272575635449ed6d6df3d@memeware.net \
--to=vsnsdualce@memeware.net \
--cc=debian-user@lists.debian.org \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=misc@openbsd.org \
--cc=rich0@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome