From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261250AbVGMQuG (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:50:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261561AbVGMQsV (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:48:21 -0400 Received: from linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net ([66.117.45.234]:34773 "EHLO linuxwireless.org.ve.carpathiahost.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261293AbVGMQrQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:47:16 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Alejandro Bonilla" To: "'Vinay Venkataraghavan'" , Cc: Subject: RE: Open source firewalls Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 10:47:10 -0600 Message-ID: <014b01c587ca$83a77320$a20cc60a@amer.sykes.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20050713163424.35416.qmail@web32110.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Are there other open source firewall implementations > other than snort? > > I would apprecitate it if you could let me know. > Thanks, > Vinay > I might be wrong and this might be a stupid answer but... How about iptables? iptables blocks everything incomind, allows, deny and forwards, so I think that is what you want? .Alejandro