From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out28-145.mail.aliyun.com (out28-145.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.28.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C3072931FF; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.28.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789519054; cv=none; b=V6oRZ8nS6ClZPNbz6Rl2K0HAapOMmbUlbSYoWaeWEiUqGcTexhmzLlm4xT3lg2W9Y4kK60jEwJBodLKGQewAPlL8XJGqOfWkYY3YXPhW+CXLLBgIQW1vVZBAEIOAV7WcmRLUBBQ5z8T8enxx3FaXMwla3Q04AXOKeP8SKoRYVdE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789519054; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UkAG70pi2/dyoRCYz8wEbaqYu82SIuXi26QHMtt/I5s=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=LR2O7r/Aw9CqerKXfIMBP2KG6iKXDuR9Lzm3hF3YIkax20rqrWL8nD3JToy65SRAkjSXRWNZeikmA/dYGbLF63Ehi9n+y4nvRreWlkdp78DNUlKmrBvcZJ4z+fwGuamrQLzlHgIi1luBeWluJsOdLE5T9BBd57seKLxwVCNa8K4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=motor-comm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=motor-comm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.28.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=motor-comm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=motor-comm.com X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=CONTINUE;BC=0.09247962|-1;CH=green;DM=|CONTINUE|false|;DS=CONTINUE|ham_system_inform|0.0533815-0.00289987-0.943719;FP=12248529796002867167|0|0|0|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=maildocker-contentspam033032023038;MF=kyle.switch@motor-comm.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=15;RT=15;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---.jEVUG-r_1789519039; Received: from 10.10.26.192(mailfrom:kyle.switch@motor-comm.com fp:SMTPD_---.jEVUG-r_1789519039 cluster:ay29) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:37:22 +0800 Message-ID: <0179cc88-0270-4056-9a71-11bf3e2cf3c1@motor-comm.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2026 08:37:19 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v18 1/3] dt-bindings: net: Document Motorcomm YT8824 PHY package To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Frank.Sae@motor-comm.com, andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: ming.xu@motor-comm.com, xiaolin.xu@motor-comm.com, jianmin.wang@motor-comm.com, jie.han@motor-comm.com References: <20260915082152.3104633-1-kyle.switch@motor-comm.com> <20260915082152.3104633-2-kyle.switch@motor-comm.com> <321725f2-7012-4fc9-8889-33ea7cef1b65@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Kyle Switch In-Reply-To: <321725f2-7012-4fc9-8889-33ea7cef1b65@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/15/26 17:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 15/09/2026 10:21, Kyle Switch wrote: >> Motorcomm YT8824 Ethernet PHY is PHY package of 4 PHY-s. >> >> Signed-off-by: Kyle Switch > I already asked you to Cc the right addresses. That was two months ago. > I don't understand why can't you just use tools which do all this > correctly, but repeating same feedback and expecting different results > is pointless, so shortly: > > NAK > > Longer explanation below. > > > Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people > and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older > kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base > your patches on recent Linux kernel. > > Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of > people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some > ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline) or work on fork of kernel > (don't, instead use mainline). Just use b4 and everything should be > fine, although remember about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new > patches to the patchset. > > You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be > tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be > a waste of time. > > Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries. Ans: sorry for this, it will be done ASAP. > Best regards, > Krzysztof