From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C727E1BC07E; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 09:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732614230; cv=none; b=gNEgt7lWv+YL1w8cLaWP9Pg3fGj3tmhrcXdoT+9rz7NA0rCCzEArInD0tIID+jVDdmfbSDg9nXo9eBHDTDgLCitDLH7owVwaRBKlWNlmjFCOm6Q3BfP/2aSrZ6448H+HqFZ62EwA68/LgGIx0b2baBihoVwmqTUDCN6rX6y9xb4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732614230; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BiEwKuqmX4KhsPyzAc5KYyXSQ0Z0HZ4DaUDlKOGAzdI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=JyzZGn1qjFQH9V1o/FUY3vPm0DTrnzbfCKXfrymiSaBHXjUaY4ehbhh6zvi99xMKbo7DfEmSPu+Px6ezIaIoFeCL3l1PU1ZsTWE5AYIiwlVrBrtnBbqywBOU+/oCR6hHXAPdr5jpU9lp0eOXazlb7AA1lZ0iImiHo3senQ6OjJc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=LaflbYGS; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="LaflbYGS" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1732614227; bh=BiEwKuqmX4KhsPyzAc5KYyXSQ0Z0HZ4DaUDlKOGAzdI=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=LaflbYGS+QTbiuEdpS9lFjQx2139EdfWctWT3G9HdCRfUvmJwSJKFImp8lxVA7qbv +JyXBnI9vclkj7KCSt6SQ9a03QpBfhYyAka52AeERt1ERkua80v3tNuuzuwyNtE7wW ea3RPmjl/hyO+7/snmnQRQbwPCt5eHtr7mk29vNC56reookqKTGyDFNBsBUitz0fPy QXnX5wbahiuxXgsMuRWZ97MooWhJav0aYv8/BqnZdykH8zk500wC7OieUhi8vcpa4J AEwh7WgA3xhuRsGz8n5p8PE/OJTVirzb+7E6PrgLPvZAUcpJ/LeOC50UcwIwAdhzSj 4K612s2YeOxew== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D12317E35CF; Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:43:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <018e7608-d9b6-47cb-9233-7733fd1647be@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 10:43:45 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts: Start sensor interrupts disabled To: =?UTF-8?B?TsOtY29sYXMgRi4gUi4gQS4gUHJhZG8=?= , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Lezcano , Zhang Rui , Lukasz Luba , Matthias Brugger , Alexandre Mergnat , Balsam CHIHI Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, Hsin-Te Yuan , Chen-Yu Tsai , =?UTF-8?Q?Bernhard_Rosenkr=C3=A4nzer?= , "Rafael J. Wysocki" References: <20241125-mt8192-lvts-filtered-suspend-fix-v1-0-42e3c0528c6c@collabora.com> <20241125-mt8192-lvts-filtered-suspend-fix-v1-4-42e3c0528c6c@collabora.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20241125-mt8192-lvts-filtered-suspend-fix-v1-4-42e3c0528c6c@collabora.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 25/11/24 22:20, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto: > Interrupts are enabled per sensor in lvts_update_irq_mask() as needed, > there's no point in enabling all of them during initialization. Change > the MONINT register initial value so all sensor interrupts start > disabled. > > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado I definitely agree Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno