From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:31:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:31:21 -0500 Received: from [212.255.16.226] ([212.255.16.226]:52220 "HELO www.topmail.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 14:31:18 -0500 Message-ID: <019101c08705$62f1bd90$0100a8c0@homeip.net> From: "mirabilos" To: "Linux-Kernel ML" In-Reply-To: <14960.29127.172573.22453@pizda.ninka.net><200101251905.f0PJ5ZG216578@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <14960.31423.938042.486045@pizda.ninka.net> Subject: Re: hotmail can't deal with ECN Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 19:30:56 -0000 Organization: eccesys.net Linux Distribution Development MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Intolerable, that's right. Isn't ECN a good new technology? Isn't there an open implementation on the `net? - So why don't they at least _start_ converting to it? mirabilos - favouring security, too -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments) GO/S dx@ s--: a--->---- C++ UL++++ P--- L++$(-^lang) E----/joe W+(++) N? o K? w-(+$) O+>+++ M-- V- PS+++@ PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5? X+ R+ !tv!---- b++++* DI- D+ G(>++) e(^age) h! r(-) y--(!y+) /* lang=NASM, GW-BASIC, C */ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/