From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:33:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:33:08 -0400 Received: from MailAndNews.com ([199.29.68.123]:6162 "EHLO MailAndNews.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:33:03 -0400 X-WM-Posted-At: MailAndNews.com; Tue, 26 Jun 01 19:32:55 -0400 Message-ID: <019701c0fe98$382c8620$c405a33e@Brekoo> Reply-To: "Marc Brekoo" From: "Marc Brekoo" To: "Robert Love" Cc: In-Reply-To: <993588379.763.0.camel@phantasy> Subject: Re: Maintainers master list? Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 01:10:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Robert Love wrote: > me. I took issue with the MAINTAINERS file when Eric brought it up > originally. However, I don't think drastic measures need to be taken. > I have seen a lot of ideas, including Meta-data in the kernel source. > > What I think we need is the simple solution: find a maintainer for the > file, cleanup the current cruft and misinformation, and then actively > work to keep the file current. I am willing to be this maintainer. > > I am not a major "maintainer" in the kernel, but I have and do > contribute. Thus I think this is a good task for me. I am willing and > wanting to do this. Comments? I've been waiting for an opportunity like this to join in, so I'd be very happy to help you with this. (This would be my first contribution to linux, please be gentle :-) Regards, Marc Brekoo