From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: Ping Li <leeonion.muyu@gmail.com>, james.morse@arm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reinette.chatre@intel.com,
fenghuay@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm_mpam: Use an atomic counter to schedule mpam_enable_once()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 10:40:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <019fee57-8984-4bd6-8912-ec9b1718eb08@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKpSQZD2hEuAF9CDD7o9F6v6j-s3sDEwVPtEk9_QLBFjk=nqvA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ping,
On 06/10/2026 07:31, Ping Li wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> Gentle ping on this patch. It would be good to know if there is
> anything else you would like changed.
> Thanks,
> Ping
>
> Ping Li <leeonion.muyu@gmail.com> 于2026年9月21日周一 19:50写道:
>
>> mpam_discovery_cpu_online() scheduled mpam_enable() after each MSC
>> probe, and mpam_enable() walked the whole MSC list taking each probe
>> lock in turn to check if all the MSCs had been probed.
>>
>> Count the MSCs that have had their hardware probed with
>> mpam_num_msc_probed, and schedule mpam_enable_once() directly when the
>> count reaches fw_num_msc, the number of MSCs reported by firmware.
>> MSCs that were already probed no longer cause work to be scheduled.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ping Li <leeonion.muyu@gmail.com>
It's a bit late for 7.4 now but I should be able to take this next cycle.
Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Thanks,
Ben
>> ---
>> Changes in v5:
>> - Schedule mpam_broken_work at the error site and return early,
>> removing the duplicate err check at the end of the function.
>>
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 69 +++++++++++----------------------
>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 2 -
>> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> index 2f09f4b78bd3..4fc82acd854e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>> @@ -49,12 +49,20 @@ static LIST_HEAD(mpam_all_msc);
>>
>> struct srcu_struct mpam_srcu;
>>
>> +/* Number of MSCs reported by firmware */
>> +static int fw_num_msc;
>> +
>> /*
>> * Number of MSCs that have been probed. Once all MSCs have been probed
>> MPAM
>> * can be enabled.
>> */
>> static atomic_t mpam_num_msc;
>>
>> +/* Number of MSCs that have had their hardware probed */
>> +static atomic_t mpam_num_msc_probed;
>> +
>> +static void mpam_enable_once(struct work_struct *work);
>> +
>> static int mpam_cpuhp_state;
>> static DEFINE_MUTEX(mpam_cpuhp_state_lock);
>>
>> @@ -72,7 +80,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(partid_max_lock);
>> * scheduled via this work_struct. If access to an MSC depends on a CPU
>> that
>> * was not brought online at boot, this can happen surprisingly late.
>> */
>> -static DECLARE_WORK(mpam_enable_work, &mpam_enable);
>> +static DECLARE_WORK(mpam_enable_work, &mpam_enable_once);
>>
>> /*
>> * All mpam error interrupts indicate a software bug. On receipt, disable
>> the
>> @@ -1854,7 +1862,6 @@ static int mpam_discovery_cpu_online(unsigned int
>> cpu)
>> {
>> int err = 0;
nit: don't need the ' = 0' anymore.
>> struct mpam_msc *msc;
>> - bool new_device_probed = false;
>>
>> if (mpam_is_enabled())
>> return 0;
>> @@ -1865,24 +1872,22 @@ static int mpam_discovery_cpu_online(unsigned int
>> cpu)
>> if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &msc->accessibility))
>> continue;
>>
>> - mutex_lock(&msc->probe_lock);
>> - if (!msc->probed)
>> - err = mpam_msc_hw_probe(msc);
>> - mutex_unlock(&msc->probe_lock);
>> + guard(mutex)(&msc->probe_lock);
>> + if (msc->probed)
>> + continue;
>>
>> - if (err)
>> - break;
>> - new_device_probed = true;
>> - }
>> + err = mpam_msc_hw_probe(msc);
>> + if (err) {
>> + mpam_disable_reason = "error during probing";
>> + schedule_work(&mpam_broken_work);
>> + return err;
>> + }
>>
>> - if (new_device_probed && !err)
>> - schedule_work(&mpam_enable_work);
>> - if (err) {
>> - mpam_disable_reason = "error during probing";
>> - schedule_work(&mpam_broken_work);
>> + if (atomic_add_return(1, &mpam_num_msc_probed) ==
>> fw_num_msc)
>> + schedule_work(&mpam_enable_work);
>> }
>>
>> - return err;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int mpam_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>> @@ -2106,8 +2111,6 @@ static struct mpam_msc *do_mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> return msc;
>> }
>>
>> -static int fw_num_msc;
>> -
>> static int mpam_msc_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> int err;
>> @@ -2713,7 +2716,7 @@ static int mpam_allocate_config(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static void mpam_enable_once(void)
>> +static void mpam_enable_once(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> int err;
>>
>> @@ -2867,34 +2870,6 @@ void mpam_disable(struct work_struct *ignored)
>> pr_err_once("MPAM disabled due to %s\n", mpam_disable_reason);
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * Enable mpam once all devices have been probed.
>> - * Scheduled by mpam_discovery_cpu_online() once all devices have been
>> created.
>> - * Also scheduled when new devices are probed when new CPUs come online.
>> - */
>> -void mpam_enable(struct work_struct *work)
>> -{
>> - static atomic_t once;
>> - struct mpam_msc *msc;
>> - bool all_devices_probed = true;
>> -
>> - /* Have we probed all the hw devices? */
>> - guard(srcu)(&mpam_srcu);
>> - list_for_each_entry_srcu(msc, &mpam_all_msc, all_msc_list,
>> - srcu_read_lock_held(&mpam_srcu)) {
>> - mutex_lock(&msc->probe_lock);
>> - if (!msc->probed)
>> - all_devices_probed = false;
>> - mutex_unlock(&msc->probe_lock);
>> -
>> - if (!all_devices_probed)
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (all_devices_probed && !atomic_fetch_inc(&once))
>> - mpam_enable_once();
>> -}
>> -
>> #define maybe_update_config(cfg, feature, newcfg, member, changes) do { \
>> if (mpam_has_feature(feature, newcfg) && \
>> (newcfg)->member != (cfg)->member) { \
>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> index 04d1a59f02af..085f086e2b2d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h
>> @@ -452,8 +452,6 @@ extern struct list_head mpam_classes;
>> extern u16 mpam_partid_max;
>> extern u8 mpam_pmg_max;
>>
>> -/* Scheduled work callback to enable mpam once all MSC have been probed */
>> -void mpam_enable(struct work_struct *work);
>> void mpam_disable(struct work_struct *work);
>>
>> /* Reset all the RIS in a class under cpus_read_lock() */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-13 9:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 13:06 [PATCH] arm_mpam: Only schedule mpam_enable work after first successful MSC probe ping.li
2026-09-08 2:48 ` [PATCH v2] " ping.li
2026-09-10 9:25 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-17 9:19 ` Yin Li
2026-09-21 12:39 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-22 6:16 ` Yin Li
2026-09-15 3:18 ` [PATCH v3] arm_mpam: Use an atomic counter to schedule mpam_enable_once() Ping Li
2026-09-15 9:48 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-15 11:56 ` [PATCH v4] " Ping Li
2026-09-21 10:49 ` Ben Horgan
2026-09-21 11:49 ` [PATCH v5] " Ping Li
[not found] ` <CAKpSQZD2hEuAF9CDD7o9F6v6j-s3sDEwVPtEk9_QLBFjk=nqvA@mail.gmail.com>
2026-10-13 9:40 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2026-10-13 13:03 ` [PATCH v6] " Ping Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=019fee57-8984-4bd6-8912-ec9b1718eb08@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=leeonion.muyu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®