From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753897AbbJTIRI (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:17:08 -0400 Received: from mailout3.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.13]:41390 "EHLO mailout3.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752464AbbJTIRF (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2015 04:17:05 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-51-5625f87dd971 From: Pavel Fedin To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" , "'Pankaj Dubey'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com References: <1445255206-11148-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1445255206-11148-7-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <56258683.7070204@samsung.com> <5625B92C.10505@samsung.com> <5625C07D.4030706@samsung.com> <014301d10b01$488873f0$d9995bd0$@samsung.com> <5625E3B9.8040707@samsung.com> In-reply-to: <5625E3B9.8040707@samsung.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 6/8] drivers: soc: add support for exynos SROM driver Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 11:17:00 +0300 Message-id: <021201d10b0f$b273bf00$175b3d00$@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-index: AQG9Ia8eArJt4afpo9M1wpUZH9cF/QFSpLw4AvroUdgCiYzwDAEzVsEcAlghzIABhfl6cJ48leHA Content-language: ru X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrCLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xq7q1P1TDDLr/GVm8fmFo0bvgKpvF psfXWC0u75rDZjHj/D4mi0Vbv7BbdCxjdGD32Lyk3qNvyypGj8+b5AKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/Tt ErgyDu13L7jKUnFl+0W2Bsa3zF2MnBwSAiYSjx5cYoewxSQu3FvP1sXIxSEksJRRYsfifUwQ zndGiUfb7rOCVLEJqEuc/vqBBSQhInCSUWLu821MIAlmAQOJHzcboDq2MklMXrAFbAengLbE zB2T2UBsYQEfieNz/4HFWQRUJdomHgCzeQUsJbonfmWHsAUlfky+xwIxVEti/c7jUAvkJTav gblbQWLH2deMILaIQIzEq51TGSFqRCSm/bvHPIFRaBaSUbOQjJqFZNQsJC0LGFlWMYqmliYX FCel5xrqFSfmFpfmpesl5+duYoTExZcdjIuPWR1iFOBgVOLh1YhRDRNiTSwrrsw9xCjBwawk wvvsBFCINyWxsiq1KD++qDQntfgQozQHi5I479xd70OEBNITS1KzU1MLUotgskwcnFINjArL TzDY++032buC52DcLJ1rZdkGzyW+ObyMlG1JXnnw09ZlTzqjpr9V4/2uusprWsHLzcIeqvpn XkhsDI48dmvR3fQLdnl92dJfA86oz1b8p7pCqOiJdJkou8/LPY0C7k/Zzd7uPHvw3N6DO2av tNA+bLjngteFvX111xdbt4nMeaXXe+Akt4QSS3FGoqEWc1FxIgDsjOYWhwIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > > Pin controller is needed in order to configure multi-functional pins correctly. > > Are there any obstacles for upstreaming it? I don't know. The last post on this topic is from March, 2015: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/330862.html. Patch 0003 has been acked-by, and nothing more since that. Actually, only 0002 and 0003 of this series are needed for the pin controller. 0001 has been accepted (27284129522e7e2a5b89e80bd44ea3345f79c9e8). Kind regards, Pavel Fedin Expert Engineer Samsung Electronics Research center Russia