Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/mm: hugetlb_madv_vs_map: fix TAP plan mismatches

["David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>]

On 10/7/26 11:28, Jaeyeon Lee wrote:
> The plan was raised from 1 to 3, but the HugeTLB setup check that may
> call ksft_exit_skip() still runs after ksft_set_plan(), so a setup
> failure reports one result against a plan of 3. Move ksft_set_plan()
> below the setup check.
> 
> Also, when the underflow check fails, or munmap() fails,
> test_underflow() jumps to err_cleanup and exits without reporting the
> remaining results. Report the munmap() failure as a test result and
> skip the final HugePages_Rsvd check in err_cleanup, so these failure
> paths report all 3 planned results.
> 
> Fixes: 827149aad495 ("selftests/mm: hugetlb_madv_vs_map: add underflow test")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Jaeyeon Lee <jaeyeon.lee.dev@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Drop the duplicate ksft_perror() and report errno in
>   ksft_test_result_fail() (Sarthak Sharma).
> 
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
> index 1d111f42dd59..0f6afb834dbf 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/hugetlb_madv_vs_map.c
> @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ void test_underflow(void)
>  
>  	/* First unmap, this will close the vma */
>  	if (munmap(huge_ptr, mmap_size) != 0) {
> -		ksft_perror("munmap failed");
> +		ksft_test_result_fail("munmap failed: %s (%d)\n", strerror(errno), errno);
>  		goto err_cleanup;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -203,18 +203,20 @@ void test_underflow(void)
>  	if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) <= 0)
>  		ksft_exit_fail_perror("waitpid failed");
>  
> +	ksft_test_result_skip("HugePages_Rsvd check after child exit\n");
>  	ksft_exit_fail();

That looks odd. SKIP + fail on the same path?

-- 
Cheers,

David