From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314392AbSEONcM>; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:32:12 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314395AbSEONcL>; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:32:11 -0400
Received: from mta02bw.bigpond.com ([139.134.6.34]:47070 "EHLO
	mta02bw.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S314392AbSEONcL>; Wed, 15 May 2002 09:32:11 -0400
Message-ID: <023101c1fc14$e62c4150$0f0da8c0@Sabine>
From: "Kingsley Foreman" <kingsley@uglypunk.com>
To: "Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: do u get better performance from optimizing the code
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 23:02:02 +0930
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

just out of curiosity will the kernel perform better if you
change the optimizations using C++ eg use  -O9 or something during compile


Kingsley