mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Peter Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>,
	linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLAB vs. pci_alloc_xxx in usb-uhci patch
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2001 15:13:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <023301c0a693$087591e0$6800000a@brownell.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010306004454.A12846@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

> Anyways, is this the end of the discussion regarding my patch?

I think one of the maintainers for usb-uhci (Georg) said he'd
want the general fix ...

> Manfred said plainly "usb-uhci is broken", Alan kinda
> manuevered around my small problem, Dave Brownell looks
> unconvinced. So?

There are two problems I see.

(1) CONFIG_SLAB_DEBUG breaks the documented
requirement that the slab cache return adequately aligned
data ... which the appended patch should probably handle
nicely (something like it sure did :-) and with less danger
than the large patch you posted.

(2) The USB host controller drivers all need something
like a pci_consistent slab cache, which doesn't currently
exist.  I have something like that in the works, and David
Miller noted one driver that I may steal from.

- Dave


--- slab.c-orig Tue Mar  6 15:01:26 2001
+++ slab.c Tue Mar  6 15:05:58 2001
@@ -676,12 +676,10 @@
  }
  
 #if DEBUG
+ /* redzoning would break cache alignment requirements */
+ if (flags & SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN)
+  flags &= ~SLAB_RED_ZONE;
  if (flags & SLAB_RED_ZONE) {
-  /*
-   * There is no point trying to honour cache alignment
-   * when redzoning.
-   */
-  flags &= ~SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN;
   size += 2*BYTES_PER_WORD; /* words for redzone */
  }
 #endif



  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-06 23:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-06  5:44 Peter Zaitcev
2001-03-06 23:13 ` David Brownell [this message]
2001-03-07  7:05   ` Manfred Spraul
2001-03-07 17:43     ` David Brownell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-05 22:08 Manfred Spraul
2001-03-05 22:52 ` David Brownell
2001-03-05 23:20   ` Russell King
2001-03-06  2:09     ` Alan Cox
2001-03-06  4:53   ` David S. Miller
2001-03-05 19:23 Peter Zaitcev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='023301c0a693$087591e0$6800000a@brownell.org' \
    --to=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®