From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
Radim Krcmar <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
Peter Hornyack <peterhornyack@google.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, kvm: use kvmclock to compute TSC deadline value
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 15:03:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <023f49ec-df7a-f196-86da-976a8a22d77e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUAm+-WP8_gVGTtvMdpBw4uhkgVA9rXy6WE2AL3TRgquw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/07/2016 15:01, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Jul 5, 2016 1:36 PM, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Bad things happen if a guest using the TSC deadline timer is migrated.
>> The guest doesn't re-calibrate the TSC after migration, and the
>> TSC frequency can and will change unless your processor supports TSC
>> scaling (on Intel this is only Skylake) or your data center is perfectly
>> homogeneous.
>>
>> The solution in this patch is to skip tsc_khz, and instead derive the
>> frequency from kvmclock's (mult, shift) pair. Because kvmclock
>> parameters convert from tsc to nanoseconds, this needs a division
>> but that's the least of our problems when the TSC_DEADLINE_MSR write
>> costs 2000 clock cycles. Luckily tsc_khz is really used by very little
>> outside the tsc clocksource (which kvmclock replaces) and the TSC
>> deadline timer.
>
> I'm wondering if it would be more straightforward to blacklist the
> APIC timer entirely (on KVM guests that have the TSC deadline
> capability) and to instead offer a paravirt clockevent that still uses
> the deadline timer under the hood. After all, these systems should be
> mostly quirk-free, so I imagine that the whole implementation would
> only be a few lines of code.
Very good idea!
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-05 17:36 Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-06 13:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-07-06 13:03 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-07-06 17:17 ` David Matlack
2016-07-08 21:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=023f49ec-df7a-f196-86da-976a8a22d77e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=peterhornyack@google.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome