From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:07:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:07:29 -0500 Received: from miranda.axis.se ([193.13.178.2]:46023 "EHLO miranda.axis.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Mar 2002 14:07:22 -0500 From: johan.adolfsson@axis.com Message-ID: <025b01c1c6d4$63c05500$aab270d5@homeip.net> Reply-To: To: , "Jamie Lokier" Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , , "Alan Cox" , "Terje Eggestad" , "Ben Greear" , "Davide Libenzi" , "george anzinger" In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: gettimeofday() system call timing curiosity Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 20:06:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What happens if you remove the printf/puts and simply counts the number of times the different cases happen? Another thought: Isn't it quite common that clock generators has a mode where the frequency differs around the desired frequency to spread the spectrum and easier pass EMC tests? Could that be the case with the laptop? /Johan