mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ming Lei" <lei.ming@attbi.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux rt priority  thread corrupt  global variable?
Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 02:03:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <029601c31540$b57f1280$0305a8c0@arch.sel.sony.com> (raw)

Platform:
Intel Pentium II; RedHat 7.2 with kernel version 2.4.7-10, libc 2.2.4-13 and
gcc 2.96.

Problem description:

a program has 3 threads of priority 12, 10, 6 respectively, and the main
process at priority 0. All the threads except main process is created with
pthread_create, and defined SCHED_FIFO as real time scheduler policy.

There is a global variable I define with 'int cpl'. All the threads and main
process may alter cpl at any time. cpl may have one of these values {0,
0xf000006e, 0xf0000068, 0xe0000000, 0xe0000060}. cpl is protected by mutex
for any access.

<Problem=> at some point of execution which cpl should be a value say
e0000060, but the actual value retained at cpl is another say e0000000; that
is, the value is changed without the program actually done anything on it.
The retained value I observed is kind of historic value(one of these value
in the above set), not the arbituary value. The problem had occured just
after context switch, also occured during a thread execution.

<Confirm> I used Intel debug register to track any writing to the cpl memory
address globally, which is the way GDB use for x86 hardware watchpoint
implementation. I could see all the writing from my program to change cpl,
but failed to see the source from which the problem occured. So I dont know
what cause the problem.

Can anyone listening give me a direction or hint on this annoying situation?

PS. please cc to this email address.
-Ming


Related questions:

Is linux kernel 2.4.10 considered strictly preemptive such as VxWorks or
other RTOS? I guess 2.4.10 may simulate preemptive with running scheduler on
every syscall or interrupt returns. Am I right?

Is printf() real-time priority thread safe?


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-08  8:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-08  9:03 Ming Lei [this message]
2003-05-08  9:43 ` Jörn Engel
2003-05-08 16:59   ` Ming Lei
2003-05-08  9:51 ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-05-08  9:52 ` Bill Huey
2003-05-08  9:59   ` Bill Huey
2003-05-08 10:42     ` Bill Huey
2003-05-08 20:45 ` Roger Larsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='029601c31540$b57f1280$0305a8c0@arch.sel.sony.com' \
    --to=lei.ming@attbi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®