From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265296AbTLGEeh (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:34:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265298AbTLGEeh (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:34:37 -0500 Received: from ca1.symonds.net ([66.92.42.136]:18305 "EHLO symonds.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265296AbTLGEee (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:34:34 -0500 Message-ID: <02a901c3bc7b$69294ee0$7a01a8c0@gandalf> From: "Mark Symonds" To: "Philippe Troin" Cc: References: <20031207023650.GA772@symonds.net> <87he0ds3sv.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> Subject: Re: 2.4.23 hard lock, 100% reproducible. Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 20:34:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [...] > > Not even sysrq? > I did get msgs twice here in the past few hours, but only sometimes does it give anything. Here's what it said: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address: 00000000 printing eip: c02363dd *pde=00000000 Oops: 0000 CPU: 0 EIP: 0010:[] Not tainted EFLAGS: 00010217 eax: 00000006 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 7a01a8c0 ecx: c700b2a0 esi: c0299ce0 edi: 000001b7 ebp: c0299d94 esp: c0299c54 ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018 process: swapper (pid: 0, stackpage = c0299000) Other than that, nothing. Is there a patch out there that will simply make 2.4.22 secure? Things run great on that kernel. -- Mark