From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0004433ADB1; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767706597; cv=none; b=VhwVSlH1O0zcxM+wTQMLSVJ02CuxhxLYFHWHXgyXOcw4QYOfAE+Daytehzj+hNoxEdZSJAg2BHTOeDHxh5nd4yNvegDSj+AyUjV34+jQAL/a54xEwJ+GQWFWJjLA5/+nZTEEhJwTLspDhdMZp5B3HrhAqpVA18abAba95eNn8Bs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1767706597; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ugrWjN9YKaxwtEr9GIzNNgTa1Ks3UI/pIfrnEQbrs6U=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:To:CC:References:Subject:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=IK/G56EW0fDa/F0xPEJaKbmvmy6J58OI466WeRIuKO3Y34xAwDO0fZuZVCTDJRQrbf51PwALfF8pbd5D7iviUk/Drp2e+u5DNTraOrLTpnyAtKWJnLmKjcjAEXeEZEg+BRLbmtp7YAx25EgcvhdwiLdTchlRH4YfMEbWrallTSM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b=cq3Scjnp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.219 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=huawei.com header.i=@huawei.com header.b="cq3Scjnp" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=huawei.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=ugrWjN9YKaxwtEr9GIzNNgTa1Ks3UI/pIfrnEQbrs6U=; b=cq3Scjnp2xIvlBwu569pMF62fg87UghZhA9zBdphRDrqM1fWujjsrZU9o3zH6wXVnLUtm+I3/ ZaZPuvwYcka4/oge5fLr2byIS5hXNEva7iQYMSxDKRxIpYoygMO4S/ttBiuX1ugtOriFswLaeOR OyH8QwbKr/cxSKjZwywdTVY= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.162.223]) by canpmsgout04.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4dlsYk3cWnz1prRG; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:33:14 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.185.36.31]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE134056D; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:36:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.177.149] (10.174.177.149) by dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:36:30 +0800 Message-ID: <02ad8760-0a6c-4a33-88ce-4f6644e1c58a@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 21:36:29 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: CC: , , , , References: <2025121634-CVE-2025-68211-180a@gregkh> Subject: Re: CVE-2025-68211: ksm: use range-walk function to jump over holes in scan_get_next_rmap_item From: Quanmin Yan In-Reply-To: <2025121634-CVE-2025-68211-180a@gregkh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems500001.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.70) To dggpemf200018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.31) Hi gregkh, I don't think this should be classified as a CVE because the patch primarily addresses a performance issue in a rare scenario. If you agree, could you please help revoke this CVE? Thanks, Quanmin Yan