From: "Nícolas F. R. A. Prado" <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To: "CK Hu (胡俊光)" <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@kernel.org" <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
"simona@ffwll.ch" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"AngeloGioacchino Del Regno"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"airlied@gmail.com" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"greenjustin@chromium.org" <greenjustin@chromium.org>,
"p.zabel@pengutronix.de" <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Cc: "Ariel D'Alessandro" <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Nancy Lin (林欣螢)" <Nancy.Lin@mediatek.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)" <Jason-JH.Lin@mediatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Daniel Stone" <daniels@collabora.com>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"kernel@collabora.com" <kernel@collabora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm/mediatek: ovl: Fix misaligned layer source size on AFBC mode
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2026 13:46:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02b19b310070df99e13aac97f1034299fa9652a2.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b640f9839f16980b6e9582815ce8588180237977.camel@mediatek.com>
On Mon, 2026-02-02 at 08:46 +0000, CK Hu (胡俊光) wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-12-30 at 11:03 -0300, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> > From: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com>
> >
> > In AFBC mode, OVL_SRC_SIZE must be block aligned. Due to this
> > limitation
> > of the AFBC format, OVL_CLIP needs to be used to achieve the
> > desired
> > output size of the layer while still meeting the alignment
> > constraints.
> > Failure to do this will result in vblank timeouts and no rendered
> > output
> > when the AFBC data source isn't aligned to the AFBC block (32x8).
> >
> > Configure OVL_CLIP so unaligned AFBC layers can be displayed.
> >
> > The following illustrates how the alignment is achieved through the
> > clip
> > settings for the horizontal coordinates, the vertical coordinates
> > are
> > analogous:
> >
> > /------------------------------------------------\
> > > |
> > > ........................ |
> > > ........................ |
> > > ........................ |
> > > ........................ |
> > > |
> > \------------------------------------------------/
> > | | | |
> > | src.x1 src.x2 |
> > | | | |
> > | |<-------------------->| |
> > | src_width |
>
> This patch looks to me.
> But "In AFBC mode, OVL_SRC_SIZE must be block aligned", so this graph
> should show as:
>
> | src.x1 src.x2 |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> N * AFBC_DATA_BLOCK_WIDTH | M * AFBC_DATA_BLOCK_WIDTH
> | | | |
> |<----->| |<----->|
> |clip_left clip_right
> | |
> |<------------------------------------>|
> | src_width |
Ah yes indeed, thanks for spotting that!
--
Thanks,
Nícolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-05 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-30 14:03 [PATCH RFC 0/6] AFBC fixes for MediaTek DRM Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 1/6] drm/mediatek: plane: Remove extra block from AFBC data payload offset Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-02 6:26 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] drm/mediatek: plane: Correct AFBC alignment definition to 128 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-02 6:28 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] drm/mediatek: ovl: Fix misaligned layer source size on AFBC mode Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-02 8:46 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2026-02-05 18:46 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado [this message]
2026-02-03 2:01 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2026-02-05 19:13 ` Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-12 1:54 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2026-02-12 7:10 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] drm/mediatek: ovl: Disallow AFBC buffers with width over 1920 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-03 2:21 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] drm/mediatek: ovl: Disable AFBC on MT8188 Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-03 2:41 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2025-12-30 14:03 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] drm/mediatek: Re-enable AFBC support on MediaTek DRM driver Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
2026-02-03 2:50 ` CK Hu (胡俊光)
2026-01-09 18:27 ` [PATCH RFC 0/6] AFBC fixes for MediaTek DRM Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02b19b310070df99e13aac97f1034299fa9652a2.camel@collabora.com \
--to=nfraprado@collabora.com \
--cc=Jason-JH.Lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=Nancy.Lin@mediatek.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
--cc=daniels@collabora.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=greenjustin@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®