From: "Nirujogi, Pratap" <pnirujog@amd.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Pratap Nirujogi <pratap.nirujogi@amd.com>,
andi.shyti@kernel.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, jsd@semihalf.com
Cc: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, mlimonci@amd.com,
benjamin.chan@amd.com, bin.du@amd.com, king.li@amd.com,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] i2c: designware: amdisp: Fix null pointer dereference in runtime resume
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:40:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <02d0bbfe-1b48-4c07-9dcc-3d34a60b55db@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2b9162e5-be5a-49eb-915a-4a557b027e13@amd.com>
On 3/20/2026 9:56 AM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/2026 4:09 PM, Nirujogi, Pratap wrote:
>> Hi Mario,
>>
>> On 3/9/2026 9:29 PM, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 3/9/2026 5:00 PM, Pratap Nirujogi wrote:
>>>> Add NULL check for i_dev->map before calling i2c_dw_init() in the
>>>> runtime resume path. The regmap may not be initialized yet when
>>>> runtime PM tries to resume the device early in the probe sequence,
>>>> leading to a NULL pointer dereference. Skip the i2c_dw_init() call
>>>> if regmap is not yet created.
>>>>
>>>> This race condition occurs when runtime PM resume is triggered before
>>>> i2c_dw_probe() completes the regmap initialization and was observed in
>>>> kernel v7.0 where the order of device enumeration has changed because
>>>> of the changes in registering the device sources in the device
>>>> hierarchy.
>>>>
>>>> Co-developed-by: Bin Du <Bin.Du@amd.com>
>>>> Fixes: 02c057ddefef ("ACPI: video: Convert the driver to a platform
>>>> one")
>>>
>>> Is this the right commit that introduced the race? Did it change the
>>> timing?
>>>
>>> Or was the race always there and we just got lucky until that commit
>>> went in?
>>>
>> My apologies for mixing up this change along with other changes that
>> were needed to fix the AMD ISP driver regressions in v7.0.
>>
>> I investigated further and found that this issue was exposed by the
>> below commit.
>>
>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/
>> commit/38fa29b01a6a295aedb69d1bbdad70acd7d204c6
>>
>> However, the resume‑probe race condition existed even earlier and had
>> not surfaced because device initialization in resume is done only when
>> init handle is valid.
>>
>> Here is some background and context on this change:
>>
>> The amdisp i2c device requires ISP to be in power on state for probe
>> to succeed. To meet this requirement, we added this device, which is a
>> amdgpu MFD child to the genpd, to control isp power using runtime PM.
>> The pm_runtime_get_sync() call before probe triggers a PM resume,
>> which powers on the ISP and also invokes the amdisp i2c runtime resume
>> before the probe completes resulting in this race condition.
>>
>> To fix this issue properly, I’m considering this change. Please review
>> and share your feedback on whether this makes sense.
>>
>> - Call dev_pm_genpd_resume() to Power ON ISP before probe
>> - Call dev_pm_genpd_suspend() to Power OFF ISP after probe
>> - Call pm_runtime_enable() after probe is successful to take care of
>> system suspend/resume.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c b/drivers/i2c/
>> busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> index 19de518be30a4..9ce58522951cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-amdisp.c
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/soc/amd/isp4_misc.h>
>>
>> @@ -76,9 +77,7 @@ static int amd_isp_dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> device_enable_async_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> - pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>> - pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> -
>> + dev_pm_genpd_resume(&pdev->dev);
>> ret = i2c_dw_probe(isp_i2c_dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> @@ -86,14 +85,14 @@ static int amd_isp_dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> goto error_release_rpm;
>> }
>> -
>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> + dev_pm_genpd_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&pdev->dev);
>> + pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> error_release_rpm:
>> amd_isp_dw_i2c_plat_pm_cleanup(isp_i2c_dev);
>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
> Good investigation. Since this was around all the time and just got
> worse I would say you should add a fixes tag for the first commit that
> introduced this driver rather than
> 38fa29b01a6a295aedb69d1bbdad70acd7d204c6 and just note in the commit
> message that 38fa29b01a6a295aedb69d1bbdad70acd7d204c6 made it worse.
Thanks, Mario. Your feedback on the Fixes tag and commit message is very
helpful, I will take care of these while submitting v2.
Thanks,
Pratap
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-20 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-09 22:00 Pratap Nirujogi
2026-03-10 1:29 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-03-19 21:09 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2026-03-20 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-20 15:38 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
2026-03-20 13:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-03-20 15:40 ` Nirujogi, Pratap [this message]
2026-03-10 11:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-03-19 21:24 ` Nirujogi, Pratap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=02d0bbfe-1b48-4c07-9dcc-3d34a60b55db@amd.com \
--to=pnirujog@amd.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benjamin.chan@amd.com \
--cc=bin.du@amd.com \
--cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
--cc=king.li@amd.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mlimonci@amd.com \
--cc=pratap.nirujogi@amd.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®