From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754670AbdCYEPj (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:15:39 -0400 Received: from bh-25.webhostbox.net ([208.91.199.152]:49708 "EHLO bh-25.webhostbox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751974AbdCYEPd (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2017 00:15:33 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/30] 4.4.57-stable review To: Kevin Hilman , "kernelci.org bot" References: <20170324151220.759111698@linuxfoundation.org> <58d5acb7.5ed7190a.6dd61.3845@mx.google.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuahkh@osg.samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com From: Guenter Roeck Message-ID: <02dd0335-8f4e-a01d-824d-98d08c3d0413@roeck-us.net> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:15:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authenticated_sender: linux@roeck-us.net X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - bh-25.webhostbox.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roeck-us.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: bh-25.webhostbox.net: authenticated_id: linux@roeck-us.net X-Authenticated-Sender: bh-25.webhostbox.net: linux@roeck-us.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03/24/2017 05:10 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > + at91 maintainers > > kernelci.org bot writes: > >> stable-rc boot: 496 boots: 1 failed, 492 passed with 2 offline, 1 conflict (v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3) >> >> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3/ >> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3/ >> >> Tree: stable-rc >> Branch: local/linux-4.4.y >> Git Describe: v4.4.56-31-gbcd1e808ead3 >> Git Commit: bcd1e808ead359a9af8476025d8b8a5349796dcd >> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git >> Tested: 97 unique boards, 23 SoC families, 31 builds out of 202 >> >> Boot Regressions Detected: >> >> arm: >> >> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_LKDTM=y: >> at91-sama5d2_xplained: >> lab-free-electrons: new failure (last pass: v4.4.51-27-g2ffd736763bc) > > This one is definitely a new regression. Hopefully the AT91 maintainers > (now Cc'd) can have a closer look. > 6b1d7b6f54c7 would be a candidate for a culprit. Guenter > [...] > >> Conflicting Boot Failure Detected: (These likely are not failures as other labs are reporting PASS. Needs review.) >> >> arm: >> >> multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: >> at91-sama5d3_xplained: >> lab-baylibre-seattle: PASS >> lab-free-electrons: FAIL > > @Alexandre: Because it's passing in my lab and failing in yours, I'm > guessing this is still the UART overflow issue we've discussed before? > > What's strange is that this defconfig in your lab seems to only be > booting for stable/linux-4.4.y[1] but not mailine or newer stable trees, > so I couldn't check if the problem still exists in mainline. > > Kevin > > [1] https://kernelci.org/boot/at91-sama5d3_xplained/?CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING&lab-free-electrons >