From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B92C43141 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F762073A for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:36:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573828563; bh=zcYNaxA6BKLXVIrEibaKGpyyFgLeOOLcofq3PI+ecco=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=cyEkb+HTITKOqvd5w1QCi8pbh9fK3Mav+ciuvj0obKv3rt/Tvf9JvlLJQc+9TVnLO UE3mbb15zK/CeZ5V64xAjw04keIHRxP8ZKe5imPolkJvwMC6u4gTpH2Nv2rBI+MZvY CN13WySnANS3iT1lPwBvsUzzsOJNPP3y2Qe0G+yM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727626AbfKOOgC (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:36:02 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50896 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727411AbfKOOgC (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:36:02 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (cpe-24-28-70-126.austin.res.rr.com [24.28.70.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFF4D20733; Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:36:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573828561; bh=zcYNaxA6BKLXVIrEibaKGpyyFgLeOOLcofq3PI+ecco=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PDTXSN7Q9BNaGWYT00xceI6zye3VrA+/YAPDFdajMlZi3HFfpMSjCShVVI6ACm1LF CnqbEPAeehgHGiIY2k55fkCm49x2fbA6wLV6Nc4PC+UnE1OyQkQbkgM4Q6YT9F5OvD IAxsiV8AQN9KM3gn6gtoyf2oWlnTWcbGpB6r6kkQ= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 32/47] serial: ucc_uart: use of_property_read_u32() in ucc_uart_probe() To: Rasmus Villemoes Cc: Qiang Zhao , Li Yang , Christophe Leroy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel , lkml , Scott Wood , linux-serial@vger.kernel.org References: <20191108130123.6839-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20191108130123.6839-33-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <9f1a846b-c303-92fa-9620-f492ef940de7@rasmusvillemoes.dk> From: Timur Tabi Message-ID: <02dd5acd-b81e-fde3-028c-16e754e846b5@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 08:35:58 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9f1a846b-c303-92fa-9620-f492ef940de7@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/15/19 2:01 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > That would be a separate patch, this patch is only concerned with > eliminating the implicit assumption of the host being big-endian. And > there's already been some pushback to adding arch-specific ifdefs (which > I agree with, but as I responded there see as the lesser evil), so > unless there's a very good reason to add that complexity, I'd rather not. We don't want to encourage people to introduce device trees that don't have the brg-frequency property in them.