From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAD6C433FE for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2022 02:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229780AbiJNCGP (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 22:06:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229776AbiJNCGM (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2022 22:06:12 -0400 Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0488218D808; Thu, 13 Oct 2022 19:06:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1665713170; x=1697249170; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjsA7tOGWV+2g8lrU2CSnPRwpnh8ov+jdIT4b7dHTw4=; b=OMoHmmHc7RktOW7IUWtVWKnoU0pg7V5W9bxCc+MmtkWx4nl8+vfrpPrA fvBSzjgarZeif9sBZYM2YoqsHmIM3fMYkUhu0VubATrwTq4CIpIK8cgoT Wi7FqywDHwDx+4nG7lDzKUwhYrYjoWrUYEzS6+gnd0dnqTzcsYCA+W2Do ZvqYVIUH2028n0lXSC6Jg2bTqnsblw14IPUwMju5NOpN/2aeudo4cWwP8 WC8H9q/ZoU7Mt6Tb1Jupl9sqXa24YU8zJyk+VbgoTe2tbNh4W7TmQ8QJ6 1nbuhqeBfCezKU4ibRAb5xAHcvSPhyPC7xdzK9gPurrJXbjBUnIZ7Domv g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10499"; a="303999273" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,182,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="303999273" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2022 19:06:09 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10499"; a="627404902" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,182,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="627404902" Received: from keweilu-mobl.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.254.208.43]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2022 19:06:05 -0700 Message-ID: <0307a5881c875e0b104051792b0f5e7f0ff973c1.camel@intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] x86/topology: Improve CPUID.1F handling From: Zhang Rui To: Dave Hansen , Len Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, corbet@lwn.net, fenghua.yu@intel.com, jdelvare@suse.com, linux@roeck-us.net, len.brown@intel.com Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:06:02 +0800 In-Reply-To: <668e5126-f344-c30b-a743-877b1783cec7@intel.com> References: <20220922133800.12918-1-rui.zhang@intel.com> <5af2d8bb-8591-78f6-8102-6f7d0df33d98@intel.com> <9a1ae0b5d7a5ee3c870195e942d58bdd9b3b71db.camel@intel.com> <668e5126-f344-c30b-a743-877b1783cec7@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Dave, On Thu, 2022-10-13 at 08:56 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 10/13/22 03:58, Len Brown wrote: > > This series of BUG FIXES needs to be marked for -stable. > > Hi Len, > > That would have been great feedback to include with your review when > your provided your acks. It's also not clear where the bug fixes > stop > and the "related fixes" begin. Is the entire series bug fixes that > need > to be marked for -stable? Patch 4/8 ~ 5/8 are real fixes and they depends on patch 2/8 and 3/8 to avoid possible regressions. So patch 2/8 ~ 5/8 should be stable material. patch 6/8 is also a bugfix, but we have not observed any functionality issues so far. thanks, rui