Re: Knowing what options a kernel was compiled with

["mirabilos" <eccesys@topmail.de>]

From: "Torrey Hoffman" <torrey.hoffman@myrio.com>
> Should someone submit a patch to copy the .config to a standard location as
> part of "make install" or "make modules_install"? If included in the
> official sources, that good example would encourage the distribution
> maintainers do the same. 
> 
> Torrey Hoffman

I dont do make install because it could do something unwanted.
modules_install isn't good either because some prefer monolithic
kernels. But split-include could do the job, as it's called as of 2.2
for each compile.

-mirabilos

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12+(proprietary extensions) # Updated:20010129 nick=mirabilos
GO/S d@ s--: a--- C++ UL++++ P--- L++$(-^lang) E----(joe) W+(++) loc=.de
N? o K? w-(+$) O+>+++ M-- V- PS+++@ PE(--) Y+ PGP t+ 5? X+ R+ !tv(silly)
b++++* DI- D+ G(>++) e(^age) h! r(-) y--(!y+) /* lang=NASM;GW-BASIC;C */
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/