mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Lynch, Rusty" <rusty.lynch@intel.com>
To: <davidm@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [patch] Kprobes ia64 qp fix
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:23:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <032EB457B9DBC540BFB1B7B519C78B0E073AE2CC@orsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)

>>>>>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 10:51:45 -0700, Rusty Lynch
><rusty.lynch@intel.com> said:
>
>  Rusty> The following patch is for the 2.6.12-rc5-mm1 + my previous
>  Rusty> "Kprobes ia64 cleanup" patch that fixes a bug where a kprobe
still
>  Rusty> fires when the instruction is predicated off.  So given the
p6=0,
>  Rusty> and we have an instruction like:
>
>  Rusty> (p6) move loc1=0
>
>  Rusty> we should not be triggering the kprobe.  This is handled by
>  Rusty> carrying over the qp section of the original instruction into
>  Rusty> the break instruction.
>
>What about:
>
>	(p6) cmp.eq.unc p9,p10=rX,rY
>
>would the code handle that right?  Similary, you may want to check for
>the correct handling of instructions that cannot be predicated (such
>as "cover").
>
>	--david

Thanks, I need to look into this one.  Let me update my test to cover
both of these cases and then take another look at our logic.

    --rusty

             reply	other threads:[~2005-05-26 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-26 18:23 Lynch, Rusty [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-26 17:51 Rusty Lynch
2005-05-26 18:18 ` David Mosberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=032EB457B9DBC540BFB1B7B519C78B0E073AE2CC@orsmsx404.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=rusty.lynch@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
    --cc=davidm@hpl.hp.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®