From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB665C77B75 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 13:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233585AbjEVNif (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2023 09:38:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231134AbjEVNid (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2023 09:38:33 -0400 Received: from sender3-op-o19.zoho.com (sender3-op-o19.zoho.com [136.143.184.19]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F905C2; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:38:32 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1684762661; cv=none; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; b=f8yckhKnjvX29o/6OVAPDAvPWP9bBU7oRRrwnUMiuXPPoPBhZTsZ5OG/x+n34rnpjDOc2OI1trj+3ucKaIKWWeq+sizFTOCyZLMeWIEjb5zVmLfSc9LFUsY4U5quxwfupmO2SITKmEHhAOnGfiN+IDj1Ar3WTc43I3sagy9qwlk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zohomail.com; s=zohoarc; t=1684762661; h=Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:From:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Message-ID:References:Subject:To; bh=W1ojuZaAzaiPlZJBWNie4sJa5sp80jGKgJddNADgIK8=; b=EH/G8W+fJ7MlKtbDemFzMxuAOSya4I7Vq9n0xiqsZ6ATjdqhai/Xq3OW6xPEm0FPiVYkKZoVTqoYLYNdCbyzrbkWwWRbNwAPaTAcSs7xy04vawSsNtig3dTWLTRKPOkFcGZcKmOdxgnXCqv3rNZYKhOK25q1ttEYp+V4gQo7tYM= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.zohomail.com; dkim=pass header.i=arinc9.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; dmarc=pass header.from= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1684762661; s=zmail; d=arinc9.com; i=arinc.unal@arinc9.com; h=Message-ID:Date:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:Subject:To:To:Cc:Cc:References:From:From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:Reply-To; bh=W1ojuZaAzaiPlZJBWNie4sJa5sp80jGKgJddNADgIK8=; b=OUrZBb8z+jJ6s62X6sb+CWDt63qTp31HJ76A2+NCUBTfMjkl4WUEwa08xvQWXrQk qynMF5vnKIQhj7q3GEZ/NPJWAfH5v4jBqjXodeynMlaKPTU+xJ85lGKFOaIN8A5A0o2 Tp9Gi5aZFzw/aQ7DD6p23qZOdNBqBjHsBVKMm4fU= Received: from [10.10.10.3] (149.91.1.15 [149.91.1.15]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1684762659016377.77661140896896; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:37:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0346d5dd-bcb8-1bd9-6943-2c9d83587364@arinc9.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:37:28 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU & LLDP, and prefer CPU port Content-Language: en-US To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Sean Wang , Landen Chao , DENG Qingfang , Daniel Golle , Florian Fainelli , Vladimir Oltean , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Matthias Brugger , AngeloGioacchino Del Regno , Russell King , Richard van Schagen , Richard van Schagen , Frank Wunderlich , Bartel Eerdekens , erkin.bozoglu@xeront.com, mithat.guner@xeront.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <20230522121532.86610-1-arinc.unal@arinc9.com> <5feba864-b792-4fe4-a58a-e1b22bb7842b@lunn.ch> From: =?UTF-8?B?QXLEsW7DpyDDnE5BTA==?= In-Reply-To: <5feba864-b792-4fe4-a58a-e1b22bb7842b@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-ZohoMailClient: External Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22.05.2023 15:25, Andrew Lunn wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:02PM +0300, arinc9.unal@gmail.com wrote: >> Hello! >> >> This patch series simplifies the code, improves the logic of the switch >> hardware support, traps LLDP frames and BPDUs for MT7530, MT7531, and >> MT7988 SoC switches, and introduces the preferring local CPU port >> operation. > > Hi Arınç > > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html > > says: > > Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes > longer to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they > find a large chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a > short time, so Maintainers just do it. As a result, a sequence of > smaller series gets merged quicker and with better review coverage. > > Given you description above, it sounds like this could easily be split > into smaller patch series. Later patches require the prior ones to apply properly. I can submit the first 15 patches, then the remaining once the first submission is applied. Would that suit you? Arınç