mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: "Andrew F. Davis" <afd@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware: ti_sci: Always request response from firmware
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 20:31:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <034a2922-1ee2-53b8-04ed-a05a66fda066@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190528155510.373-1-afd@ti.com>

On 28/05/2019 18:55, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the
> TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages already do
> this, set this for the ones that do not.
> 
> This will be enforced in future firmware that better match the TI-SCI
> specifications, this patch will not break users of existing firmware.
> 
> Fixes: aa276781a64a ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <afd@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <ajhernandez@ti.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes from v1:
>   - Rebased on v5.2-rc2

Thanks, queuing up for 5.3.

-Tero

> 
>   drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index ef93406ace1b..36ce11a67235 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -466,9 +466,9 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_get_revision(struct ti_sci_info *info)
>   	struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	/* No need to setup flags since it is expected to respond */
>   	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_VERSION,
> -				   0x0, sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
> +				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> +				   sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr),
>   				   sizeof(*rev_info));
>   	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
>   		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> @@ -596,9 +596,9 @@ static int ti_sci_get_device_state(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>   	info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
>   	dev = info->dev;
>   
> -	/* Response is expected, so need of any flags */
>   	xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_GET_DEVICE_STATE,
> -				   0, sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> +				   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
> +				   sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
>   	if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
>   		ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
>   		dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> 

--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-28 15:55 Andrew F. Davis
2019-06-11 17:31 ` Tero Kristo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=034a2922-1ee2-53b8-04ed-a05a66fda066@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=afd@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nm@ti.com \
    --cc=ssantosh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®