From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751956AbZHXIVA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:21:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751081AbZHXIU7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:20:59 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:42232 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751829AbZHXIU6 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:20:58 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,264,1249282800"; d="scan'208";a="544151028" From: "Wang, Shane" To: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar CC: Andi Kleen , "Cihula, Joseph" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "arjan@linux.intel.com" , "chrisw@sous-sol.org" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "jbeulich@novell.com" , "peterm@redhat.com" , "Wei, Gang" Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:20:05 +0800 Subject: RE: [PATCH] intel_txt: fix the build errors of intel_txt patch on non-X86 platforms Thread-Topic: [PATCH] intel_txt: fix the build errors of intel_txt patch on non-X86 platforms Thread-Index: AcoihBpVxMaOWNEVRG+wL0/wgDA7vgCDyh/g Message-ID: <037F493892196B458CD3E193E8EBAD4F01EC3ABB56@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <4A4ACA66.2000706@intel.com> <20090817154055.GA12985@elte.hu> <20090817155348.GA2254@elte.hu> <037F493892196B458CD3E193E8EBAD4F01EC3AB3B2@pdsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20090820161038.GA29994@basil.fritz.box> <4A8E9B3C.5070604@intel.com> <20090821135050.GA30346@elte.hu> <4A8EBBF6.3020505@intel.com> <20090821161204.GB17731@elte.hu> <4A8ED800.30901@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4A8ED800.30901@zytor.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> >> If then these should be dummy inlines - but in any case, do you >> expect tboot to be used by non-x86 too? >> > > It would have to be IA64 ... I can't ask Tony since he's out, but I > would assume it is x86-specific at this point. > > -hpa Yes, to my knowledge, it is x86 at this point. TXT-SX is the server extension also for ia32 only. Shane