From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: daejun7.park@samsung.com, ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"avri.altman@wdc.com" <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"jejb@linux.ibm.com" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"asutoshd@codeaurora.org" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
"cang@codeaurora.org" <cang@codeaurora.org>,
"tomas.winkler@intel.com" <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@samsung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@samsung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@samsung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
Adel Choi <adel.choi@samsung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 18:16:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0389f9cf-fea8-9990-7699-0e4322728e4a@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <963815509.21591323002276.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1>
On 2020-06-04 18:56, Daejun Park wrote:
> +static struct ufshpb_req *ufshpb_get_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> + struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn)
> +{
> + struct ufshpb_req *map_req;
> + struct request *req;
> + struct bio *bio;
> +
> + map_req = kmem_cache_alloc(hpb->map_req_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!map_req)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + req = blk_get_request(hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->request_queue,
> + REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT);
> + if (IS_ERR(req))
> + goto free_map_req;
> +
> + bio = bio_alloc(GFP_KERNEL, hpb->pages_per_srgn);
> + if (!bio) {
> + blk_put_request(req);
> + goto free_map_req;
> + }
> +
> + map_req->hpb = hpb;
> + map_req->req = req;
> + map_req->bio = bio;
> +
> + map_req->rgn_idx = srgn->rgn_idx;
> + map_req->srgn_idx = srgn->srgn_idx;
> + map_req->mctx = srgn->mctx;
> + map_req->lun = hpb->lun;
> +
> + return map_req;
> +free_map_req:
> + kmem_cache_free(hpb->map_req_cache, map_req);
> + return NULL;
> +}
Will blk_get_request() fail if all tags have been allocated? Can that
cause a deadlock or infinite loop?
> +static inline void ufshpb_set_read_buf_cmd(unsigned char *cdb, int rgn_idx,
> + int srgn_idx, int srgn_mem_size)
> +{
> + cdb[0] = UFSHPB_READ_BUFFER;
> + cdb[1] = UFSHPB_READ_BUFFER_ID;
> +
> + put_unaligned_be32(srgn_mem_size, &cdb[5]);
> + /* cdb[5] = 0x00; */
> + put_unaligned_be16(rgn_idx, &cdb[2]);
> + put_unaligned_be16(srgn_idx, &cdb[4]);
> +
> + cdb[9] = 0x00;
> +}
So the put_unaligned_be32(srgn_mem_size, &cdb[5]) comes first because
the put_unaligned_be16(srgn_idx, &cdb[4]) overwrites byte cdb[5]? That
is really ugly. Please use put_unaligned_be24() instead if that is what
you meant and keep the put_*() calls in increasing cdb offset order.
> +static int ufshpb_map_req_add_bio_page(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> + struct request_queue *q, struct bio *bio,
> + struct ufshpb_map_ctx *mctx)
> +{
> + int i, ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < hpb->pages_per_srgn; i++) {
> + ret = bio_add_pc_page(q, bio, mctx->m_page[i], PAGE_SIZE, 0);
> + if (ret != PAGE_SIZE) {
> + dev_notice(&hpb->hpb_lu_dev,
> + "bio_add_pc_page fail %d\n", ret);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Why bio_add_pc_page() instead of bio_add_page()?
> +static int ufshpb_execute_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
> + struct ufshpb_req *map_req)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q;
> + struct request *req;
> + struct scsi_request *rq;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + q = hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->request_queue;
> + ret = ufshpb_map_req_add_bio_page(hpb, q, map_req->bio,
> + map_req->mctx);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_notice(&hpb->hpb_lu_dev,
> + "map_req_add_bio_page fail %d - %d\n",
> + map_req->rgn_idx, map_req->srgn_idx);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + req = map_req->req;
> +
> + blk_rq_append_bio(req, &map_req->bio);
> + req->rq_flags |= RQF_QUIET;
> + req->timeout = MAP_REQ_TIMEOUT;
> + req->end_io_data = (void *)map_req;
> +
> + rq = scsi_req(req);
> + ufshpb_set_read_buf_cmd(rq->cmd, map_req->rgn_idx,
> + map_req->srgn_idx, hpb->srgn_mem_size);
> + rq->cmd_len = HPB_READ_BUFFER_CMD_LENGTH;
> +
> + blk_execute_rq_nowait(q, NULL, req, 1, ufshpb_map_req_compl_fn);
> +
> + atomic_inc(&hpb->stats.map_req_cnt);
> + return 0;
> +}
Why RQF_QUIET?
Why a custom timeout instead of the SCSI LUN timeout?
Can this function be made asynchronous such that it does not have to be
executed on the context of a workqueue?
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-11 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p8>
2020-06-05 1:16 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Daejun Park
2020-06-06 12:02 ` Avri Altman
[not found] ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p1>
2020-06-05 1:30 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-10 4:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11 1:39 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-09 0:51 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
[not found] ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p2>
2020-06-05 1:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-06 18:26 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 1:15 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11 1:16 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-06-05 2:12 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
2020-06-06 18:38 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 1:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11 1:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-11 6:43 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 0:53 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-10 3:51 ` RE: [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-10 9:50 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] scsi: ufs: Add Host Performance Booster Support Bean Huo
[not found] ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p4>
2020-06-09 0:49 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09 7:00 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 0:52 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-09 6:39 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 6:48 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-12 2:25 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-12 2:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS-feature layer Daejun Park
2020-06-12 4:28 ` Bart Van Assche
[not found] ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p5>
2020-06-05 1:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter Daejun Park
2020-06-06 12:11 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-10 2:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read Daejun Park
2020-06-12 3:37 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-13 15:24 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-05 1:38 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] scsi: ufs: Introduce HPB module Daejun Park
2020-06-06 14:58 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-07 7:06 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-10 4:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2020-06-10 9:57 ` Bean Huo
[not found] ` <CGME20200605011604epcms2p8bec8ef6682583d7248dc7d9dc1bfc882@epcms2p6>
2020-06-12 2:29 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09 0:52 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-09 6:51 ` Avri Altman
2020-06-09 0:53 ` Daejun Park
2020-06-12 3:39 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] scsi: ufs: Prepare HPB read for cached sub-region Daejun Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0389f9cf-fea8-9990-7699-0e4322728e4a@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=adel.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=boram.shin@samsung.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=sangyoon.oh@samsung.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=sungjun07.park@samsung.com \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ymhungry.lee@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®