From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75699C04E69 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234538AbjG0JcG (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:32:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53950 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233893AbjG0Jbh (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2023 05:31:37 -0400 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A27F10CB for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 02:22:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDFCB660702D; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 10:22:42 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1690449763; bh=S/wbNwp3nrSfYIJnj3igDnsaM+YXoYwXtjo1HiG2GSY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=UeHMww9WHVwfwzRWImHwPNMGzQT6w3uY4WUBl3itguPwaAsQyhCIkLVcsr6LNGUCM cq1yGASbKjo2bYM1LiERIssfgP8hq3Rnkk9eN+PkkH1jF+4uzTtwRcJhFvzPq/XI73 68Ht18QlmtjF18Y9oFcW+6fnDtO2Qcb2N4IskV8NPybKToDPUa7xmZgmjkm9+AAbTP MP8lSR8AZnXzoMJ+ZbehchOXAn6ILdIo2KQN+XJCU8pT2F4ju7WbJd6dOeqifmBUvD KvZDPQldI8hpv+rgj4FjSui5VWU82WzqMP+tDhn1Pc5mFERcn5wTnHgKyr4dLyVKG1 mZNkCK0gzT56Q== Message-ID: <040c1db8-4ae1-2a6c-ff58-282ed938e565@collabora.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 11:22:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: Fix potential memory leak if vmap() fail To: Sui Jingfeng , Chun-Kuang Hu , Philipp Zabel , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Matthias Brugger , CK Hu Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Mergnat References: <20230706134000.130098-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn> Content-Language: en-US From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20230706134000.130098-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 06/07/23 15:40, Sui Jingfeng ha scritto: > Also return -ENOMEM if such a failure happens, the implement should take > responsibility for the error handling. > > Fixes: 3df64d7b0a4f ("drm/mediatek: Implement gem prime vmap/vunmap function") > Reviewed-by: Matthias Brugger > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Mergnat > Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno