From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@amd.com>, ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, muthusamy.ramalingam@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add HSMP client support for Family 1Ah
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 16:27:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04201312-5535-45cc-a93c-4e71b66e1dc4@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729164034.1331375-2-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
On 7/29/26 11:40, Muralidhara M K wrote:
> Add non-ACPI HSMP mailbox support, Ryzen Master SMC client message
> descriptors, and platform routing for the Family 1Ah client platforms:
>
> Models 80h-87h Medusa1
> Models 88h-8Fh Olympic Ridge
> Models E0h-E3h Medusa2
>
> All three share the same client mailbox addresses and message set, so a
> single is_client_platform() predicate covers them, and the two adjacent
> Model 8xh ranges are tested as one.
>
> The client parts drive a different mailbox from the server HSMP
> interface. They expose no _DSD/_CRS to discover the mailbox, so the SMN
> addresses are fixed in hsmp.h and shared by the platform and ACPI
> probes, and they speak the Ryzen Master SMC (RMSMC) message set rather
> than the server message IDs. Add that message set and its descriptor
> table to the UAPI header.
>
> Two message descriptor tables now exist, so every lookup has to pick the
> one matching the running platform. Rather than test the platform at each
> lookup, describe the platform once: struct hsmp_plat_desc holds the
> mailbox addresses, the descriptor table and its size, and the IDs of the
> messages the driver issues itself. get_hsmp_pdev() resolves it, which
> both drivers call before they bring any socket up and which runs on a
> CPU that is fixed long before either can load. The server descriptor is
> also the static initialiser, so the message plumbing cannot reach a NULL
> descriptor even if a future caller arrives another way.
>
> get_msg_desc() then indexes the table behind that pointer, and
> validate_message(), is_get_msg(), hsmp_ioctl_msg(), hsmp_test() and
> hsmp_cache_proto_ver() read the bound and the message IDs from the
> descriptor. get_msg_desc() returns NULL rather than indexing out of
> range if a caller skipped the bounds check, and the Spectre v1 clamp in
> hsmp_ioctl_msg() uses the running platform's table size.
>
> In init_platform_device() the mailbox setup becomes a copy of the
> descriptor's addresses. The F1Ah M0h message-id offset stays behind
> is_f1a_m0h() as an override, because it applies only to this non-ACPI
> path while the descriptor is shared with the ACPI one. It cannot disturb
> the client mailbox: it requires model <= 0x0F and the client models are
> all >= 0x80. The server mailbox addresses move from plat.c to hsmp.h so
> both address sets sit with the descriptors that consume them; the values
> are unchanged, written to the same width as the client set they now sit
> beside.
>
> Since this is the change that lets the platform driver match the client
> models, it also has to let the client probe survive the interface-version
> query. Some client SMU builds reject HSMP_CLIENT_GET_INTERFACE_VER with
> "invalid message" even though the mailbox works, as the test message
> issued just before it shows, so treat that failure as non-fatal on the
> client and register the socket anyway. Nothing on the client depends on
> the reported version: hsmp_pdev->proto_ver gates the metrics_bin
> attribute and the protocol_version sysfs file, both of which describe
> the server interface. The query stays fatal on server parts.
>
> The client descriptor table carries __attribute__((unused)), matching
> hsmp_msg_desc_table[]. Both are defined in a UAPI header that several
> translation units include without using the table, so without it
> -Wunused-const-variable fires on plat.c, acpi.c and hwmon.c.
>
> Document the client platforms in Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst,
> which until now described HSMP as available only on the EPYC server
> parts and MI300A. The character device and ioctl interface are unchanged
> there; what differs is the accepted message IDs, so the text points at
> the HSMP_CLIENT_* set in the UAPI header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
Generic comment for the series.
With such rich function comments, I think a lot of this would be really
valuable to have as kdoc (/** */) and then reference in hsmp documentation.
> ---
> Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst | 18 +++-
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h | 73 ++++++++++++++
> drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c | 39 ++++----
> 5 files changed, 354 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst b/Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst
> index fa1fc240e212..8a9d6fe7d4cf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp.rst
> @@ -8,6 +8,21 @@ Newer Fam19h(model 0x00-0x1f, 0x30-0x3f, 0x90-0x9f, 0xa0-0xaf),
> Fam1Ah(model 0x00-0x1f) EPYC server line of processors from AMD support
> system management functionality via HSMP (Host System Management Port).
>
> +The Fam1Ah client platforms are supported as well:
> +
> + ============= =============
> + Model Platform
> + ============= =============
> + 0x80-0x87 Medusa1
> + 0x88-0x8f Olympic Ridge
> + 0xe0-0xe3 Medusa2
> + ============= =============
> +
> +They share one mailbox and speak the Ryzen Master SMC message set instead
> +of the server HSMP message set, so the message IDs accepted on them are
> +the HSMP_CLIENT_* ones listed in arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h.
> +The character device and ioctl interface described below are the same.
> +
> The Host System Management Port (HSMP) is an interface to provide
> OS-level software with access to system management functions via a
> set of mailbox registers.
> @@ -17,7 +32,8 @@ More details on the interface can be found in chapter
> Eg: https://docs.amd.com/v/u/en-US/55898_B1_pub_0_50
>
>
> -HSMP interface is supported on EPYC line of server CPUs and MI300A (APU).
> +HSMP interface is supported on EPYC line of server CPUs, MI300A (APU) and
> +the Fam1Ah client platforms listed above.
>
>
> HSMP device
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h
> index eda336bfd3e9..b4c3ddb9d1c1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/amd_hsmp.h
> @@ -664,4 +664,141 @@ struct hsmp_telemetry_data {
> #define HSMP_IOCTL_GET_TELEMETRY_DATA \
> _IOW(HSMP_BASE_IOCTL_NR, 1, struct hsmp_telemetry_data)
>
> +/*
> + * Client HSMP messages supported on the Family 1Ah client platforms:
> + * Models 80h-87h (Medusa1), Models 88h-8Fh (Olympic Ridge) and
> + * Models E0h-E3h (Medusa2).
> + * These map to Ryzen Master SMC (RMSMC) message IDs.
> + */
> +enum hsmp_client_message_ids {
> + HSMP_CLIENT_TEST = 1, /* 01h Test message */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_SMU_VER, /* 02h SMU FW version */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_INTERFACE_VER, /* 03h Interface version */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE_VER, /* 04h Metrics table version */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE, /* 05h Metrics table log sample */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE_DRAM_ADDR,/* 06h Metrics table DRAM address */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CORE_PSM_MARGIN, /* 07h Set core PSM margin */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_ALL_CORE_PSM_MARGIN, /* 08h Set all core PSM margin */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FAST_PPT_LIMIT, /* 09h Set fast PPT limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_VDD_CURRENT_LIMIT, /* 0Ah Set VRM VDD current limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_VDD_MAX_CURRENT_LIMIT,/* 0Bh Set VRM VDD max current limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_TJ_MAX, /* 0Ch Set TjMax */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FIT_LIMIT_SCALAR, /* 0Dh Set FIT limit scalar */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_ENABLE_OVERCLOCKING, /* 0Eh Enable overclocking */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_DISABLE_OVERCLOCKING, /* 0Fh Disable overclocking */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_FREQ_ALL_CORES,/* 10h Set OC freq all cores */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_FREQ_PER_CORE,/* 11h Set OC freq per core */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_VID, /* 12h Set OC VID */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FCLK_OVERCLOCK_ON_THE_FLY,/* 13h Set FCLK OC on-the-fly */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_CORE_PERF_ORDER, /* 14h Get core performance order */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SUSTAINED_POWER_LIMIT, /* 15h Set sustained power limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SLOW_PPT_LIMIT, /* 16h Set slow PPT limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_GFX_MAX_CURRENT_LIMIT,/* 17h Set VRM GFX max current limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_SOC_CURRENT_LIMIT, /* 18h Set VRM SOC current limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FAST_SPM_LIMIT, /* 19h Set fast SPM limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SLOW_SPM_LIMIT, /* 1Ah Set slow SPM limit */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_CORE_PSM_MARGIN, /* 1Bh Get core PSM margin */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_GET_GFX_PSM_MARGIN, /* 1Ch Get GFX PSM margin */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1D, /* 1Dh Spare */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1E, /* 1Eh Spare */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1F, /* 1Fh Spare */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X20, /* 20h Spare */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFXCLK_OVERDRIVE_BY_FREQ_VID,/* 21h Set GfxClk overdrive by freq/VID */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_DISABLE_GFXCLK_OVERDRIVE, /* 22h Disable GfxClk overdrive */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFX_PSM_MARGIN, /* 23h Set GFX PSM margin */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CCLK_FMAX_OFFSET, /* 24h Set CCLK Fmax offset */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CORE_POWER_LIMIT_OFFSET,/* 25h Set core power limit offset */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_ADD_EXTRA_PSM_GUARDBAND, /* 26h Add extra PSM guardband */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_ADD_EXTRA_PSM_GUARDBAND_GFX,/* 27h Add extra PSM guardband GFX */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFXCLK_FMAX, /* 28h Set GfxClk Fmax */
> + HSMP_CLIENT_MSG_ID_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +/* Client message descriptor table (Family 1Ah Models 80h-8Fh, E0h-E3h) */
> +static const struct hsmp_msg_desc hsmp_client_msg_desc_table[]
> + __attribute__((unused)) = {
> + /* RESERVED */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_RSVD},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_TEST */
> + {1, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_SMU_VER */
> + {0, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_INTERFACE_VER */
> + {0, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE_VER */
> + {0, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_METRICS_TABLE_DRAM_ADDR */
> + {0, 3, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CORE_PSM_MARGIN */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_ALL_CORE_PSM_MARGIN */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FAST_PPT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_VDD_CURRENT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_VDD_MAX_CURRENT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_TJ_MAX */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FIT_LIMIT_SCALAR */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_ENABLE_OVERCLOCKING */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_DISABLE_OVERCLOCKING */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_FREQ_ALL_CORES */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_FREQ_PER_CORE */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_OVERCLOCK_VID */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FCLK_OVERCLOCK_ON_THE_FLY */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_CORE_PERF_ORDER */
> + {1, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SUSTAINED_POWER_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SLOW_PPT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_GFX_MAX_CURRENT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_VRM_SOC_CURRENT_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_FAST_SPM_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_SLOW_SPM_LIMIT */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_CORE_PSM_MARGIN */
> + {1, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_GET_GFX_PSM_MARGIN */
> + {0, 1, HSMP_GET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1D */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_RSVD},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1E */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_RSVD},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X1F */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_RSVD},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SPARE_0X20 */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_RSVD},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFXCLK_OVERDRIVE_BY_FREQ_VID */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_DISABLE_GFXCLK_OVERDRIVE */
> + {0, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFX_PSM_MARGIN */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CCLK_FMAX_OFFSET */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_CORE_POWER_LIMIT_OFFSET */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_ADD_EXTRA_PSM_GUARDBAND */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_ADD_EXTRA_PSM_GUARDBAND_GFX */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> + /* HSMP_CLIENT_SET_GFXCLK_FMAX */
> + {1, 0, HSMP_SET},
> +};
How would you feel about adding a static (compile time) assert that the
number of entries here matched the number of enums?
This can avoid making a mistake later.
> +
> #endif /*_ASM_X86_AMD_HSMP_H_*/
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c
> index 5e123a4ecea9..9b65dbd47965 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,67 @@
> */
> #define CHECK_GET_BIT BIT(31)
>
> -static struct hsmp_plat_device hsmp_pdev;
> +static const struct hsmp_mbaddr_info hsmp_mbinfo_server = {
> + .base_addr = SMN_HSMP_BASE,
> + .msg_id_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID,
> + .msg_resp_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP,
> + .msg_arg_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA,
> +};
> +
> +/* RM: Ryzen Master, the SMC interface these client addresses belong to */
> +static const struct hsmp_mbaddr_info hsmp_mbinfo_client = {
> + .base_addr = SMN_HSMP_BASE_RM,
> + .msg_id_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_RM,
> + .msg_resp_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP_RM,
> + .msg_arg_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA_RM,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * The descriptors carry only the message IDs the driver issues itself, which
> + * are also the only ones the two message sets have in common. Messages named
> + * by userspace in an ioctl need no entry here, as that path already resolves
> + * the ID against the running platform's table.
> + */
> +static const struct hsmp_plat_desc hsmp_desc_server = {
> + .mbinfo = &hsmp_mbinfo_server,
> + .msg_desc = hsmp_msg_desc_table,
> + .num_msgs = HSMP_MSG_ID_MAX,
> + .test_msg = HSMP_TEST,
> + .proto_ver_msg = HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER,
> +};
> +
> +/* The client drives a different mailbox with the Ryzen Master SMC message set */
> +static const struct hsmp_plat_desc hsmp_desc_client = {
> + .mbinfo = &hsmp_mbinfo_client,
> + .msg_desc = hsmp_client_msg_desc_table,
> + .num_msgs = HSMP_CLIENT_MSG_ID_MAX,
> + .test_msg = HSMP_CLIENT_TEST,
> + .proto_ver_msg = HSMP_CLIENT_GET_INTERFACE_VER,
> +};
> +
> +static struct hsmp_plat_device hsmp_pdev = {
> + /*
> + * Overridden for the client in get_hsmp_pdev(), which every driver
> + * calls before it touches a socket. Defaulting it here rather than
> + * leaving it NULL keeps the message plumbing safe for any caller that
> + * arrives without going through there.
> + */
> + .desc = &hsmp_desc_server,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Callers must bounds-check msg_id against desc->num_msgs first; this returns
> + * NULL rather than indexing out of range if they did not.
> + */
> +static inline const struct hsmp_msg_desc *get_msg_desc(u32 msg_id)
> +{
> + const struct hsmp_plat_desc *desc = hsmp_pdev.desc;
> +
> + if (msg_id >= desc->num_msgs)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + return &desc->msg_desc[msg_id];
> +}
>
> /*
> * Gates the AMD HSMP data plane against socket bring-up and teardown.
> @@ -184,30 +244,37 @@ static int __hsmp_send_message(struct hsmp_socket *sock, struct hsmp_message *ms
>
> static int validate_message(struct hsmp_message *msg)
> {
> + const struct hsmp_msg_desc *desc;
> +
> /* msg_id against valid range of message IDs */
> - if (msg->msg_id < HSMP_TEST || msg->msg_id >= HSMP_MSG_ID_MAX)
> + if (msg->msg_id < hsmp_pdev.desc->test_msg ||
> + msg->msg_id >= hsmp_pdev.desc->num_msgs)
> + return -ENOMSG;
> +
> + desc = get_msg_desc(msg->msg_id);
> + if (!desc)
> return -ENOMSG;
>
> /* msg_id is a reserved message ID */
> - if (hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg->msg_id].type == HSMP_RSVD)
> + if (desc->type == HSMP_RSVD)
> return -ENOMSG;
>
> /*
> * num_args passed by user should match the num_args specified in
> * message description table.
> */
> - if (msg->num_args != hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg->msg_id].num_args)
> + if (msg->num_args != desc->num_args)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> /*
> * As the HSMP protocol evolves, newer platforms may define more
> * response arguments for existing messages. Use an upper-bound
> * check so that older userspace callers requesting fewer response
> - * words than what the current hsmp_msg_desc_table[] defines are
> - * still accepted, while rejecting requests that exceed the
> - * hardware capability.
> + * words than what the current descriptor table defines are still
> + * accepted, while rejecting requests that exceed the hardware
> + * capability.
> */
> - if (msg->response_sz > hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg->msg_id].response_sz)
> + if (msg->response_sz > desc->response_sz)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> return 0;
> @@ -316,7 +383,7 @@ int hsmp_test(u16 sock_ind, u32 value)
> * Test the hsmp port by performing TEST command. The test message
> * takes one argument and returns the value of that argument + 1.
> */
> - msg.msg_id = HSMP_TEST;
> + msg.msg_id = hsmp_pdev.desc->test_msg;
> msg.num_args = 1;
> msg.response_sz = 1;
> msg.args[0] = value;
> @@ -340,10 +407,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hsmp_test, "AMD_HSMP");
>
> static bool is_get_msg(struct hsmp_message *msg)
> {
> - if (hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg->msg_id].type == HSMP_GET)
> + const struct hsmp_msg_desc *desc = get_msg_desc(msg->msg_id);
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return false;
> +
> + if (desc->type == HSMP_GET)
> return true;
>
> - if (hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg->msg_id].type == HSMP_SET_GET &&
> + if (desc->type == HSMP_SET_GET &&
> (msg->args[0] & CHECK_GET_BIT))
> return true;
>
> @@ -354,6 +426,7 @@ static long hsmp_ioctl_msg(struct file *fp, unsigned long arg)
> {
> int __user *arguser = (int __user *)arg;
> struct hsmp_message msg = { 0 };
> + const struct hsmp_msg_desc *desc;
> int ret;
>
> if (copy_struct_from_user(&msg, sizeof(msg), arguser, sizeof(struct hsmp_message)))
> @@ -361,23 +434,28 @@ static long hsmp_ioctl_msg(struct file *fp, unsigned long arg)
>
> /*
> * Check msg_id is within the range of supported msg ids
> - * i.e within the array bounds of hsmp_msg_desc_table
> + * i.e within the array bounds of the platform's descriptor table
> */
> - if (msg.msg_id < HSMP_TEST || msg.msg_id >= HSMP_MSG_ID_MAX)
> + if (msg.msg_id < hsmp_pdev.desc->test_msg ||
> + msg.msg_id >= hsmp_pdev.desc->num_msgs)
> return -ENOMSG;
>
> /*
> * Sanitize the user-controlled msg_id against speculative
> * execution. The bounds check above retires the out-of-range
> * case with -ENOMSG, but a mispredicted branch can still let the
> - * CPU speculatively use msg_id as an index into
> - * hsmp_msg_desc_table[] (here and in validate_message() /
> + * CPU speculatively use msg_id as an index into the message
> + * descriptor tables (here and in validate_message() /
> * is_get_msg() called downstream via hsmp_send_message()), and
> * pull arbitrary kernel memory into the cache (Spectre v1,
> * CVE-2017-5753). Clamp once into msg.msg_id so every downstream
> * dereference sees the sanitized value.
> */
> - msg.msg_id = array_index_nospec(msg.msg_id, HSMP_MSG_ID_MAX);
> + msg.msg_id = array_index_nospec(msg.msg_id, hsmp_pdev.desc->num_msgs);
> +
> + desc = get_msg_desc(msg.msg_id);
> + if (!desc || desc->type == HSMP_RSVD)
> + return -ENOMSG;
>
> switch (fp->f_mode & (FMODE_WRITE | FMODE_READ)) {
> case FMODE_WRITE:
> @@ -410,7 +488,7 @@ static long hsmp_ioctl_msg(struct file *fp, unsigned long arg)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (hsmp_msg_desc_table[msg.msg_id].response_sz > 0) {
> + if (desc->response_sz > 0) {
> /* Copy results back to user for get/monitor commands */
> if (copy_to_user(arguser, &msg, sizeof(struct hsmp_message)))
> return -EFAULT;
> @@ -687,9 +765,9 @@ int hsmp_cache_proto_ver(u16 sock_ind)
> struct hsmp_message msg = { 0 };
> int ret;
>
> - msg.msg_id = HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER;
> + msg.msg_id = hsmp_pdev.desc->proto_ver_msg;
> msg.sock_ind = sock_ind;
> - msg.response_sz = hsmp_msg_desc_table[HSMP_GET_PROTO_VER].response_sz;
> + msg.response_sz = get_msg_desc(msg.msg_id)->response_sz;
>
> ret = hsmp_send_message_locked(&msg);
> if (!ret)
> @@ -735,6 +813,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hsmp_misc_deregister, "AMD_HSMP");
>
> struct hsmp_plat_device *get_hsmp_pdev(void)
> {
> + /*
> + * Both drivers call this before they bring any socket up, and the CPU
> + * this selects on is fixed long before either can load, so resolving
> + * the platform description here is enough to have it in place for
> + * every mailbox access and for the probe paths themselves.
> + */
> + if (is_client_platform())
> + hsmp_pdev.desc = &hsmp_desc_client;
> +
> return &hsmp_pdev;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(get_hsmp_pdev, "AMD_HSMP");
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h
> index 8dbff16a87b1..b4bd9800dee1 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/hsmp.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> #ifndef HSMP_H
> #define HSMP_H
>
> +#include <asm/amd/hsmp.h>
> +
> #include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/hwmon.h>
> @@ -17,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/processor.h>
> #include <linux/rwsem.h>
> #include <linux/semaphore.h>
> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
> @@ -32,6 +35,51 @@
>
> #define DRIVER_VERSION "2.6"
You're adding new IOCTL's in patches 5 and 6, does this version need to
bump for userspace to discover?
>
> +/*
> + * To access a specific HSMP mailbox register, s/w writes the SMN address of the
> + * HSMP mailbox register into the SMN_INDEX register, and reads/writes the
> + * SMN_DATA reg. Below are the SMN addresses of the HSMP mailbox registers in
> + * SMU address space, as consumed by the fixed mailbox descriptors in hsmp.c.
> + *
> + * The server set is used by the non-ACPI path only; the ACPI path discovers the
> + * equivalent values from _CRS/_DSD. The _RM set is the client one, named for
> + * the Ryzen Master SMC (RMSMC) interface whose mailbox it addresses, and is
> + * used by both paths because the client exposes no _CRS/_DSD to discover them
> + * from. The two sets share a base and differ only in the register offsets
> + * behind it, but are kept separate so each stays tied to the platform it was
> + * documented for.
> + */
> +#define SMN_HSMP_BASE 0x03B00000
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID 0x00010534
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H 0x00010934
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP 0x00010980
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA 0x000109E0
> +
> +/* _RM: Ryzen Master SMC, the client mailbox */
> +#define SMN_HSMP_BASE_RM 0x03B00000
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_RM 0x00010A8C
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP_RM 0x00010A90
> +#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA_RM 0x00010A94
Although these are the same for these 3 platforms, they might not be the
same for the follow on ones. Have you seen the work that's going into
the AMD_PMF driver to build structs of register lists? Take a look at this.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pdx86/platform-drivers-x86.git/commit/?h=review-ilpo-next&id=e860e561926bf75e323d43fe59a9bf25d2ef33a3
> +
> +/*
> + * Family 1Ah client platforms use the Ryzen Master SMC (client) mailbox and
> + * message set instead of the server HSMP interface:
> + *
> + * Models 80h-87h Medusa1
> + * Models 88h-8Fh Olympic Ridge
> + * Models E0h-E3h Medusa2
> + *
> + * They all share the SMN_HSMP_*_RM mailbox addresses above and the same
> + * message set, so one predicate covers them and the two adjacent Model 8xh
> + * ranges are tested as one.
> + */
> +static inline bool is_client_platform(void)
> +{
> + return boot_cpu_data.x86 == 0x1A &&
> + ((boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0x80 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0x8F) ||
> + (boot_cpu_data.x86_model >= 0xE0 && boot_cpu_data.x86_model <= 0xE3));
> +}
Rather than enumerating lists of CPU IDs, could you instead go off the
ACPI ID? Or are these identical from server to client?
> +
> struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
> u32 base_addr;
> u32 msg_id_off;
> @@ -40,6 +88,30 @@ struct hsmp_mbaddr_info {
> u32 size;
> };
>
> +/*
> + * Per-platform description of the mailbox and the message set behind it.
> + * Resolved once from the running CPU and reached through hsmp_pdev->desc, so
> + * neither the message plumbing nor the probe paths have to re-derive which
> + * platform they are on.
> + *
> + * @mbinfo: fixed SMN mailbox addresses. The ACPI path uses these
> + * only where firmware exposes no _CRS/_DSD to read them
> + * from, i.e. on the client.
> + * @msg_desc: message descriptor table, indexed by message ID.
> + * @num_msgs: number of entries in @msg_desc, and so the exclusive
> + * upper bound on a valid message ID.
> + * @test_msg: no-op message used to probe the mailbox. Also the
> + * lowest valid message ID, as ID 0 is reserved.
> + * @proto_ver_msg: returns the interface version.
> + */
> +struct hsmp_plat_desc {
> + const struct hsmp_mbaddr_info *mbinfo;
> + const struct hsmp_msg_desc *msg_desc;
> + u32 num_msgs;
> + u32 test_msg;
> + u32 proto_ver_msg;
> +};
> +
> struct hsmp_socket {
> struct bin_attribute hsmp_attr;
> struct hsmp_mbaddr_info mbinfo;
> @@ -59,6 +131,7 @@ struct hsmp_socket {
> struct hsmp_plat_device {
> struct miscdevice mdev;
> struct hsmp_socket *sock;
> + const struct hsmp_plat_desc *desc;
> u32 proto_ver;
> u16 num_sockets;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c
> index e9b2b809c0f5..7423c98a7b3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/hsmp/plat.c
> @@ -29,17 +29,6 @@
>
> #define DRIVER_NAME "amd_hsmp"
>
> -/*
> - * To access specific HSMP mailbox register, s/w writes the SMN address of HSMP mailbox
> - * register into the SMN_INDEX register, and reads/writes the SMN_DATA reg.
> - * Below are required SMN address for HSMP Mailbox register offsets in SMU address space
> - */
> -#define SMN_HSMP_BASE 0x3B00000
> -#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID 0x0010534
> -#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H 0x0010934
> -#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP 0x0010980
> -#define SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA 0x00109E0
> -
> static struct hsmp_plat_device *hsmp_pdev;
>
> static int amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr(struct hsmp_socket *sock, u32 offset,
> @@ -157,20 +146,18 @@ static int init_platform_device(struct device *dev)
> sock = &hsmp_pdev->sock[i];
> sock->sock_ind = i;
> sock->dev = dev;
> - sock->mbinfo.base_addr = SMN_HSMP_BASE;
> sock->amd_hsmp_rdwr = amd_hsmp_pci_rdwr;
> + sock->mbinfo = *hsmp_pdev->desc->mbinfo;
>
> /*
> * This is a transitional change from non-ACPI to ACPI, only
> * family 0x1A, model 0x00 platform is supported for both ACPI and non-ACPI.
> + * It is the one part whose message-id register sits at a
> + * different offset on this path than the descriptor gives.
> */
> if (is_f1a_m0h())
> sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID_F1A_M0H;
> - else
> - sock->mbinfo.msg_id_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_ID;
>
> - sock->mbinfo.msg_resp_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_RESP;
> - sock->mbinfo.msg_arg_off = SMN_HSMP_MSG_DATA;
> sema_init(&sock->hsmp_sem, 1);
>
> /* Test the hsmp interface on each socket */
> @@ -184,8 +171,18 @@ static int init_platform_device(struct device *dev)
>
> ret = hsmp_cache_proto_ver(i);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
> - return ret;
> + /*
> + * Some client SMU builds reject the interface-version
> + * query with "invalid message" even though the mailbox
> + * is functional, as the test message above just
> + * showed. Keep going there instead of failing the
> + * probe: proto_ver only gates server-side features.
> + */
> + if (!is_client_platform()) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to read HSMP protocol version\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> + dev_warn(dev, "Interface version query unsupported on client SMU; continuing\n");
Shouldn't this be fatal? Can we fix the F/W to follow the expected HSMP
driver behavior?
> }
>
> if (hsmp_pdev->proto_ver == HSMP_PROTO_VER6) {
> @@ -317,6 +314,12 @@ static bool legacy_hsmp_support(void)
> case 0x1A:
> switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_model) {
> case 0x00 ... 0x0F:
> + /*
> + * Client platforms: 80h-87h (Medusa1), 88h-8Fh (Olympic
> + * Ridge), E0h-E3h (Medusa2)
> + */
> + case 0x80 ... 0x8F:
> + case 0xE0 ... 0xE3:
> return true;
> default:
> return false;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 16:40 [PATCH 0/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Family 1Ah client support Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add HSMP client support for Family 1Ah Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 21:27 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2026-07-30 9:37 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-30 16:43 ` Armin Wolf
2026-07-31 4:27 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-31 7:00 ` Shyam Sundar S K
2026-07-31 10:29 ` Armin Wolf
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Route metric table through the client messages Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 21:29 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-30 9:42 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 3/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add ACPI client support via the SMNR method Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 21:30 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-30 9:44 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Leave the hwmon power sensors off on client platforms Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 21:35 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-30 10:01 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add SMN read IOCTL support Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 6/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add MSR " Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 16:40 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation/arch/x86/amd_hsmp: Document the SMN and MSR IOCTLs Muralidhara M K
2026-07-29 21:41 ` Mario Limonciello
2026-07-30 10:05 ` M K, Muralidhara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04201312-5535-45cc-a93c-4e71b66e1dc4@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muralidhara.mk@amd.com \
--cc=muthusamy.ramalingam@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®