From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>, <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
<yunlong.song@icloud.com>
Cc: <chao@kernel.org>, <miaoxie@huawei.com>,
<bintian.wang@huawei.com>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND] Revert "f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry"
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 11:36:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <043afe52-6c41-933f-9382-07cee10f447f@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1509327221-159302-1-git-send-email-yunlong.song@huawei.com>
On 2017/10/30 9:33, Yunlong Song wrote:
> This reverts commit 5e443818fa0b2a2845561ee25bec181424fb2889
>
> The commit should be reverted because call sequence of below two parts
> of code must be kept:
> a. update sit information, it needs to be updated before segment
> allocation since latter allocation may trigger SSR, and SSR allocation
> needs latest valid block information of all segments.
> b. update segment status, it needs to be updated after segment allocation
> since we can skip updating current opened segment status.
>
> Fixes: 5e443818fa0b ("f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry")
> Suggested-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
Thanks,
> ---
> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 -
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index 13a96b8..f166112 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -2567,7 +2567,6 @@ int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> bool is_checkpointed_data(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr);
> void init_discard_policy(struct discard_policy *dpolicy, int discard_type,
> unsigned int granularity);
> -void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t old, block_t new);
> void stop_discard_thread(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> bool f2fs_wait_discard_bios(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> void clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct cp_control *cpc);
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index 46dfbca..a3509e9 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -1884,14 +1884,11 @@ static void update_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t blkaddr, int del)
> get_sec_entry(sbi, segno)->valid_blocks += del;
> }
>
> -void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t old, block_t new)
> +static void refresh_sit_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t old, block_t new)
> {
> update_sit_entry(sbi, new, 1);
> if (GET_SEGNO(sbi, old) != NULL_SEGNO)
> update_sit_entry(sbi, old, -1);
> -
> - locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old));
> - locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, new));
> }
>
> void invalidate_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t addr)
> @@ -2529,13 +2526,22 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
>
> stat_inc_block_count(sbi, curseg);
>
> + /*
> + * SIT information should be updated before segment allocation,
> + * since SSR needs latest valid block information.
> + */
> + refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> +
> if (!__has_curseg_space(sbi, type))
> sit_i->s_ops->allocate_segment(sbi, type, false);
> +
> /*
> - * SIT information should be updated after segment allocation,
> - * since we need to keep dirty segments precisely under SSR.
> + * segment dirty status should be updated after segment allocation,
> + * so we just need to update status only one time after previous
> + * segment being closed.
> */
> - refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr);
> + locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, old_blkaddr));
> + locate_dirty_segment(sbi, GET_SEGNO(sbi, *new_blkaddr));
>
> mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-28 11:57 [PATCH] " Chao Yu
2017-10-28 15:43 ` [PATCH v2] This reverts commit 5e443818fa0b2a2845561ee25bec181424fb2889 Yunlong Song
2017-10-30 1:33 ` [PATCH v2 RESEND] Revert "f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry" Yunlong Song
2017-10-30 3:36 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2017-10-30 9:39 ` Jaegeuk Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=043afe52-6c41-933f-9382-07cee10f447f@huawei.com \
--to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
--cc=bintian.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miaoxie@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@huawei.com \
--cc=yunlong.song@icloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®