Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

[Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>]

Hi Thomas,

On 9/29/2018 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Reinette,
> 
> On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no
>> objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix.
>>
>> If I understand the tip branches correctly the core patch seems to be
>> headed to v4.19 while the rest (excluding the final patch
>> "x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements") are headed to v4.20.
>>
>> Have you decided against including this into v4.19 or did I
>> misunderstand the responses and/or branches?
> 
> I did not decide anything yet. It's not going into -rc6 as it's not yet
> through next and the other standard testing.
> 
> I'm also looking at the other set of RDT fixes, which obviously want to go
> as well. So not sure how to deal with all of that.
> 

When you do deal with this series could you please also include the
final patch ("x86/intel_rdt: Re-enable pseudo-lock measurements")? I
noticed that patches 1/6 to 5/6 have been merged into x86/cache in
tip.git and then some other work on top of it. It is not clear to me why
6/6 was omitted and this fix does require it.

Thank you very much

Reinette