From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: opendmb@gmail.com, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, justin.chen@broadcom.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bcmgenet: stop Tx NAPI before disabling the queues
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:58:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <04f56981130312235dfad369c9fa0b22@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179008122084.2160803.1051800375963129894@kernel.org>
Hi (S|Cl)ashiko
On 22.9.2026 14:47, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let
> patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your
> reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [High] Incomplete fix: the Wake-on-LAN branch of bcmgenet_suspend()
> keeps the exact queue-stop-before-Tx-NAPI-stop ordering that this…
>
> --
>
> net: bcmgenet: stop Tx NAPI before disabling the queues
>
> This moves bcmgenet_disable_tx_napi() ahead of netif_tx_disable() in
> bcmgenet_netif_stop(), so an in-flight Tx completion can no longer call
> netif_tx_wake_queue() after the queues have been stopped and before
> bcmgenet_fini_dma() frees the rings.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> index b916080f4ff17..0789b60e664ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> @@ -3441,6 +3441,8 @@ static void bcmgenet_netif_stop(struct
>> net_device *dev, bool stop_phy)
>> {
>> struct bcmgenet_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>>
>> + /* Stop completion polling before it can wake a stopped queue */
>> + bcmgenet_disable_tx_napi(priv);
>> netif_tx_disable(dev);
>
> [Severity: High]
>
> The commit message says:
>
> Close is safe because dev_deactivate_many() stops the qdisc first.
> bcmgenet_suspend() does not, so stop Tx NAPI before the queues.
>
> bcmgenet_suspend() only reaches bcmgenet_netif_stop() in the non-WoL
> else
> branch. Does the Wake-on-LAN branch still have the ordering this patch
> declares unsafe?
Yes, and the window is even wider: bcmgenet_tdma_disable() spins up to
5 ms (DMA_TIMEOUT_VAL), and nothing re-stops the queue afterwards.
The reordering makes sense to me, so I will send a v2.
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:bcmgenet_suspend() {
> if (device_may_wakeup(d) && priv->wolopts) {
> netif_tx_disable(dev);
> ...
> /* HFB programming, interrupt clearing */
> ...
> if (-ETIMEDOUT == bcmgenet_tdma_disable(priv))
> netdev_warn(priv->dev,
> "Timed out while disabling TX DMA\n");
>
> bcmgenet_disable_tx_napi(priv);
> bcmgenet_disable_rx_napi(priv);
> disable_irq(priv->irq1);
> bcmgenet_tx_reclaim_all(dev);
> bcmgenet_fini_tx_napi(priv);
> } else {
> /* Teardown the interface */
> bcmgenet_netif_stop(dev, true);
> }
> }
>
> Between netif_tx_disable() and bcmgenet_disable_tx_napi() here,
> priv->irq1
> is still enabled and the Tx NAPI is still live, and
> bcmgenet_tdma_disable()
> spins in udelay, so the window is not short. Can bcmgenet_tx_poll() run
> in
> that window and undo the stop?
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:bcmgenet_tx_poll() {
> work_done = __bcmgenet_tx_reclaim(ring->priv->dev, ring);
> if (ring->free_bds > (MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)) {
> txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(ring->priv->dev, ring->index);
> netif_tx_wake_queue(txq);
> }
> }
>
> Nothing later in the WoL branch re-stops the queue, and suspend does
> not
> call dev_deactivate(), so the qdisc stays attached. sch_direct_xmit()
> gates
> only on the per-txq stop bit, not on netif_device_present(), so the
> netif_device_detach() done earlier in bcmgenet_suspend() does not block
> a
> transmit:
>
> net/sched/sch_generic.c:sch_direct_xmit() {
> HARD_TX_LOCK(dev, txq, smp_processor_id());
> if (!netif_xmit_frozen_or_stopped(txq))
> skb = dev_hard_start_xmit(skb, dev, txq, &ret);
> }
>
> A kernel-generated transmit is enough to hit this (ARP/ND reply, TCP
> retransmit, forwarding), so freezing user space does not close it.
>
> Two follow-on questions about that path:
>
> Can this leak the skb and its DMA mapping? A transmit arriving after
> bcmgenet_tx_reclaim_all() dma_map_single()s the skb into ring->cbs
> while
> TDMA is already disabled, so no completion reclaims it. On the
> WoL-success
> resume path, bcmgenet_resume() -> bcmgenet_init_tx_queues() ->
> bcmgenet_init_tx_ring() resets the software and hardware indices
> without
> walking cbs:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:bcmgenet_init_tx_ring()
> {
> ring->cbs = priv->tx_cbs + start_ptr;
> ring->size = size;
> ring->clean_ptr = start_ptr;
> ring->c_index = 0;
> ring->free_bds = size;
> ring->write_ptr = start_ptr;
> ring->cb_ptr = start_ptr;
> ring->prod_index = 0;
> }
>
> Neither that function nor the resume path calls
> netdev_tx_reset_queue(), so
> does the netdev_tx_sent_queue() accounting from the stray xmit leave
> BQL
> skewed as well?
AFAIU this should be fixed with the reordering suggest above.
>
> And on the WoL-failure resume path, can this reproduce the same
> use-after-free quoted in the commit message?
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c:bcmgenet_resume() {
> /* MAC was reset so complete bcmgenet_netif_stop() */
> umac_enable_set(priv, CMD_RX_EN | CMD_TX_EN, false);
> bcmgenet_rdma_disable(priv);
> bcmgenet_intr_disable(priv);
> bcmgenet_fini_dma(priv);
> }
>
> bcmgenet_fini_dma() kfree()s priv->tx_cbs while the Tx queue is still
> runnable, and bcmgenet_init_dma() only reallocates it after
> init_umac(),
> phy_init_hw() and genphy_config_aneg(), so bcmgenet_xmit() ->
> bcmgenet_get_txcb() would write through ring->cbs into freed memory.
Same as above.
>
> Would it make sense to reorder the WoL branch as well, moving
> bcmgenet_disable_tx_napi() ahead of netif_tx_disable() there?
Yes, makes sense and should fix all of the above.
pw-bot: cr
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 12:44 Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-09-22 12:47 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-09-22 12:58 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=04f56981130312235dfad369c9fa0b22@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®