From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 8 May 2001 18:42:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 8 May 2001 18:41:57 -0400 Received: from mta1.snfc21.pbi.net ([206.13.28.122]:971 "EHLO mta1.snfc21.pbi.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 8 May 2001 18:41:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 15:38:09 -0700 From: David Brownell Subject: Re: pci_pool_free from IRQ To: "David S. Miller" , Alan Cox Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" , Pete Zaitcev , johannes@erdfelt.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <050701c0d80f$8f876ca0$6800000a@brownell.org> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <200105082108.f48L8X1154536@saturn.cs.uml.edu> <15096.27479.707679.544048@pizda.ninka.net> X-Priority: 3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pete's patch to pci_pool_free() is fine with me, and I'd be glad to see that bit of pci interface cleaned up. Any changes needed other than the pci.txt doc update? - Dave ----- Original Message ----- From: "David S. Miller" To: "Alan Cox" Cc: "Albert D. Cahalan" ; "Pete Zaitcev" ; ; ; ; Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:55 PM Subject: Re: pci_pool_free from IRQ > > Alan Cox writes: > > I suspect we should fix the documentation (and if need be the code) to reflect > > the fact that you have to be completely out of your tree to handle device > > removal in the irq handler > > Agreed. > > Later, > David S. Miller > davem@redhat.com