From: "lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>,
"aharonl@nvidia.com" <aharonl@nvidia.com>,
"leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mbloch@nvidia.com" <mbloch@nvidia.com>,
"liangwenpeng@huawei.com" <liangwenpeng@huawei.com>,
"yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
"rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
"y-goto@fujitsu.com" <y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 08:55:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <050c3183-2fc6-03a1-eecd-258744750972@fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4h2Cuzm_fn9fi9RqQ_iEwOwuc9qdk5x_7W=VXvsOAVPFA@mail.gmail.com>
On 17/01/2022 02:11, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:13 PM lizhijian@fujitsu.com
> <lizhijian@fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add Dan to the party :)
>>
>> May i know whether there is any existing APIs to check whether
>> a va/page backs to a nvdimm/pmem ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 06/01/2022 08:21, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 04:07:08PM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
>>>> We can use it to indicate whether the registering mr is associated with
>>>> a pmem/nvdimm or not.
>>>>
>>>> Currently, we only assign it in rxe driver, for other device/drivers,
>>>> they should implement it if needed.
>>>>
>>>> RDMA FLUSH will support the persistence feature for a pmem/nvdimm.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>>> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> include/rdma/ib_verbs.h | 1 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>>>> index 7c4cd19a9db2..bcd5e7afa475 100644
>>>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_mr.c
>>>> @@ -162,6 +162,50 @@ void rxe_mr_init_dma(struct rxe_pd *pd, int access, struct rxe_mr *mr)
>>>> mr->type = IB_MR_TYPE_DMA;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +// XXX: the logic is similar with mm/memory-failure.c
>>>> +static bool page_in_dev_pagemap(struct page *page)
>>>> +{
>>>> + unsigned long pfn;
>>>> + struct page *p;
>>>> + struct dev_pagemap *pgmap = NULL;
>>>> +
>>>> + pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>>>> + if (!pfn) {
>>>> + pr_err("no such pfn for page %p\n", page);
>>>> + return false;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + p = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
>>>> + if (!p) {
>>>> + if (pfn_valid(pfn)) {
>>>> + pgmap = get_dev_pagemap(pfn, NULL);
>>>> + if (pgmap)
>>>> + put_dev_pagemap(pgmap);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return !!pgmap;
>>> You need to get Dan to check this out, but I'm pretty sure this should
>>> be more like this:
>>>
>>> if (is_zone_device_page(page) && page->pgmap->type == MEMORY_DEVICE_FS_DAX)
>> Great, i have added him.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> +static bool iova_in_pmem(struct rxe_mr *mr, u64 iova, int length)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct page *page = NULL;
>>>> + char *vaddr = iova_to_vaddr(mr, iova, length);
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!vaddr) {
>>>> + pr_err("not a valid iova %llu\n", iova);
>>>> + return false;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + page = virt_to_page(vaddr);
>>> And obviously this isn't uniform for the entire umem, so I don't even
>>> know what this is supposed to mean.
>> My intention is to check if a memory region belongs to a nvdimm/pmem.
>> The approach is like that:
>> iova(user space)-+ +-> page -> page_in_dev_pagemap()
>> | |
>> +-> va(kernel space) -+
>> Since current MR's va is associated with map_set where it record the relations
>> between iova and va and page. Do do you mean we should travel map_set to
>> get its page ? or by any other ways.
> Apologies for the delay in responding.
>
> The Subject line of this patch is confusing, if you want to know if a
> pfn is in persistent memory the only mechanism for that is:
>
> region_intersects(addr, length, IORESOURCE_MEM, IORES_DESC_PERSISTENT_MEMORY)
>
> ...there is otherwise nothing pmem specific about the dev_pagemap
> infrastructure. Yes, pmem is the primary user, but it is also used for
> mapping "soft-reserved" memory (See: the EFI_MEMORY_SP) attribute, and
> other users.
>
> Can you clarify the intent? I am missing some context.
thanks for your help @Dan
I'm going to implement a new ibvers called RDMA FLUSH, it will support global visibility
and persistence placement type.
In my first design, only pmem can support persistence placement type, so i need to introduce
new attribute is_pmem to RDMA memory region where it associates to a user space address iova
so that i can reject a persistence placement type to DRAM(non-pmem).
Thanks
Zhijian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-18 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-28 8:07 [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 01/10] RDMA: mr: Introduce is_pmem Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:12 ` lizhijian
2022-01-14 8:10 ` Li, Zhijian
2022-01-27 22:30 ` Jeff Moyer
2022-01-16 18:11 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-18 8:55 ` lizhijian [this message]
2022-01-18 15:28 ` Dan Williams
2022-01-19 2:01 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 02/10] RDMA: Allow registering MR with flush access flags Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 03/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering FLUSH flags for supported device only Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:20 ` lizhijian
2022-01-13 6:43 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 04/10] RDMA/rxe: Enable IB_DEVICE_RDMA_FLUSH for rxe device Li Zhijian
2022-01-06 0:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:26 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 05/10] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering persistent flag for pmem MR only Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:25 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 3:34 ` lizhijian
2021-12-31 14:40 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04 1:32 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 06/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement RC RDMA FLUSH service in requester side Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 07/10] RDMA/rxe: Set BTH's SE to zero for FLUSH packet Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 08/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush execution in responder side Li Zhijian
2021-12-30 22:18 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 1:37 ` lizhijian
2021-12-31 2:32 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-04 8:51 ` lizhijian
2022-01-04 16:02 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-06 0:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-04 16:40 ` Tom Talpey
2022-01-05 1:43 ` lizhijian
2022-01-06 0:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-06 6:42 ` lizhijian
2022-01-06 17:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-10 5:45 ` lizhijian
2022-01-10 14:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-11 5:34 ` lizhijian
2022-01-11 20:48 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-12 9:50 ` lizhijian
2022-01-12 13:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-01-13 6:29 ` lizhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 09/10] RDMA/rxe: Implement flush completion Li Zhijian
2021-12-28 8:07 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 10/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RD FLUSH service support Li Zhijian
2021-12-29 8:49 ` [RFC PATCH rdma-next 00/10] RDMA/rxe: Add RDMA FLUSH operation Gromadzki, Tomasz
2021-12-29 14:35 ` Tom Talpey
2021-12-31 1:10 ` lizhijian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=050c3183-2fc6-03a1-eecd-258744750972@fujitsu.com \
--to=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
--cc=aharonl@nvidia.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=liangwenpeng@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
--cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
--cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®