From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Eranian Stephane <eranian@google.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
broonie@kernel.org, Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v6 12/22] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:56:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05159761-274e-4a6b-97d9-a1251d6cac7b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260210200407.GQ2995752@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2/11/2026 4:04 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 03:20:37PM +0800, Dapeng Mi wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>> index d487c55a4f3e..5742126f50cc 100644
>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>> @@ -7761,6 +7761,50 @@ perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static void
>> +perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
>> + struct perf_event *event,
>> + struct pt_regs *regs,
>> + u64 mask, u32 pred_mask)
>> +{
>> + u16 pred_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
>> + u16 vec_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
>> + u16 nr_vectors;
>> + u16 nr_pred;
>> + int bit;
>> + u64 val;
>> + u16 i;
>> +
>> + nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
>> + nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
>> +
>> + perf_output_put(handle, nr_vectors);
>> + perf_output_put(handle, vec_qwords);
>> + perf_output_put(handle, nr_pred);
>> + perf_output_put(handle, pred_qwords);
>> +
>> + if (nr_vectors) {
>> + for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
>> + if (!(BIT_ULL(bit) & mask))
>> + continue;
>> + for (i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
>> + val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
>> + perf_output_put(handle, val);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> + if (nr_pred) {
>> + for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(pred_mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
>> + if (!(BIT(bit) & pred_mask))
>> + continue;
>> + for (i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
>> + val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
>> + perf_output_put(handle, val);
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
> Yeah, that works, but it does make me sad. The existing
> perf_output_sample_regs() has yet another solution.
>
> Wondering how hard it could possibly be to write a for_each_set_bit()
> variant that works on a given word (instead of an array), I did the
> below.
>
> It works (at least, the assembly looks about right); but I'm not sure
> its all I had hoped for either :-(
Pretty code! It looks I still haven't gotten used to writing such kind of
macros.
The code looks good to me, I would test it later. Thanks.
>
> ---
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -7754,18 +7754,27 @@ void __weak perf_get_regs_user(struct pe
> regs_user->abi = perf_reg_abi(current);
> }
>
> +/* Until GCC-14+/clang-19+, which have __builtin_ctzg() */
> +#define __ctzg(val, def) \
> + (val) ? _Generic((val), \
> + unsigned int: __builtin_ctz(val), \
> + unsigned long: __builtin_ctzl(val), \
> + unsigned long long: __builtin_ctzll(val)) : (def)
> +
> +#define __next_bit(val, bit) \
> + ({ auto __v = (val); \
> + __v &= GENMASK(sizeof(__v) * BITS_PER_BYTE - 1, bit); \
> + __ctzg(__v, -1); })
> +
> +#define word_for_each_set_bit(bit, val) \
> + for (int bit = 0; bit = __next_bit(val, bit), bit >= 0; bit++)
> +
> static void
> perf_output_sample_regs(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
> struct pt_regs *regs, u64 mask)
> {
> - int bit;
> - DECLARE_BITMAP(_mask, 64);
> -
> - bitmap_from_u64(_mask, mask);
> - for_each_set_bit(bit, _mask, sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE) {
> - u64 val;
> -
> - val = perf_reg_value(regs, bit);
> + word_for_each_set_bit(bit, mask) {
> + u64 val = perf_reg_value(regs, bit);
> perf_output_put(handle, val);
> }
> }
> @@ -7778,14 +7787,8 @@ perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf
> {
> u16 pred_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_pred_reg_qwords;
> u16 vec_qwords = event->attr.sample_simd_vec_reg_qwords;
> - u16 nr_vectors;
> - u16 nr_pred;
> - int bit;
> - u64 val;
> - u16 i;
> -
> - nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
> - nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
> + u16 nr_vectors = hweight64(mask);
> + u16 nr_pred = hweight32(pred_mask);
>
> perf_output_put(handle, nr_vectors);
> perf_output_put(handle, vec_qwords);
> @@ -7793,21 +7796,17 @@ perf_output_sample_simd_regs(struct perf
> perf_output_put(handle, pred_qwords);
>
> if (nr_vectors) {
> - for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
> - if (!(BIT_ULL(bit) & mask))
> - continue;
> - for (i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
> - val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
> + word_for_each_set_bit(bit, mask) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < vec_qwords; i++) {
> + u64 val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, false);
> perf_output_put(handle, val);
> }
> }
> }
> if (nr_pred) {
> - for (bit = 0; bit < sizeof(pred_mask) * BITS_PER_BYTE; bit++) {
> - if (!(BIT(bit) & pred_mask))
> - continue;
> - for (i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
> - val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
> + word_for_each_set_bit(bit, pred_mask) {
> + for (int i = 0; i < pred_qwords; i++) {
> + u64 val = perf_simd_reg_value(regs, bit, i, true);
> perf_output_put(handle, val);
> }
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-09 7:20 [Patch v6 00/22] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 01/22] perf/x86/intel: Restrict PEBS_ENABLE writes to PEBS-capable counters Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11 5:47 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 02/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable large PEBS sampling for XMMs Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 03/22] perf/x86/intel: Convert x86_perf_regs to per-cpu variables Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 04/22] perf: Eliminate duplicate arch-specific functions definations Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 05/22] perf/x86: Use x86_perf_regs in the x86 nmi handler Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 18:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11 6:26 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 06/22] perf/x86: Introduce x86-specific x86_pmu_setup_regs_data() Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 07/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Add xsaves_nmi() helper Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 08/22] x86/fpu: Ensure TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD is set after saving FPU state Dapeng Mi
2026-02-11 19:39 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-11 19:55 ` Dave Hansen
2026-02-24 6:50 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-24 5:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-24 19:13 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25 0:35 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 09/22] perf: Move and rename has_extended_regs() for ARCH-specific use Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 10/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM Register Sampling for Non-PEBS Events Dapeng Mi
2026-02-15 23:58 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-24 7:11 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-24 19:13 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25 0:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25 1:11 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25 1:36 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-25 3:14 ` Chang S. Bae
2026-02-25 6:13 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 11/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM register sampling for REGS_USER case Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 12/22] perf: Add sampling support for SIMD registers Dapeng Mi
2026-02-10 20:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-02-11 6:56 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 13/22] perf/x86: Enable XMM sampling using sample_simd_vec_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 14/22] perf/x86: Enable YMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 15/22] perf/x86: Enable ZMM " Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 16/22] perf/x86: Enable OPMASK sampling using sample_simd_pred_reg_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 17/22] perf: Enhance perf_reg_validate() with simd_enabled argument Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 18/22] perf/x86: Enable eGPRs sampling using sample_regs_* fields Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 19/22] perf/x86: Enable SSP " Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 20/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable PERF_PMU_CAP_SIMD_REGS capability Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 21/22] perf/x86/intel: Enable arch-PEBS based SIMD/eGPRs/SSP sampling Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 7:20 ` [Patch v6 22/22] perf/x86: Activate back-to-back NMI detection for arch-PEBS induced NMIs Dapeng Mi
2026-02-09 8:48 ` [Patch v6 00/22] Support SIMD/eGPRs/SSP registers sampling for perf Mi, Dapeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05159761-274e-4a6b-97d9-a1251d6cac7b@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome