From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AA6C433ED for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D997613B1 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S242374AbhDEQbS (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:31:18 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:58613 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S238474AbhDEQbR (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2021 12:31:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1617640270; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9lG+nLR5IoYSNGo0IQTIdcrOzj+guXrJm8gXPF7fbQI=; b=h5J6Jj/m+L7x2Qiews4b3lPs+os0YB95vEmQTkhqyb4MXbObDsDhZlwZq1ts7paestQz6n nhh4IcV5aQwVONpJxs+1ZZoJC1RboWLHu9SZjs/tX4W+bUUVI0LWS9I7PfBfflY9n1AhLU Huc6QgyQ9tpzbwjLqHOo4cwvBmPhQZE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-154-TM7Gs4ibP2GI3VgXCeSJwQ-1; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 12:31:07 -0400 X-MC-Unique: TM7Gs4ibP2GI3VgXCeSJwQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E83EF802575; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.36.112.13] (ovpn-112-13.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.13]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0E01349A; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 16:31:00 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] KVM/ARM: Some vgic fixes and init sequence KVM selftests To: Marc Zyngier Cc: eric.auger.pro@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, drjones@redhat.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com References: <20210404172243.504309-1-eric.auger@redhat.com> <877dlhf3ae.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Auger Eric Message-ID: <051db106-791c-46e7-d921-23e2bfb68b7e@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 18:30:58 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <877dlhf3ae.wl-maz@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Marc, On 4/5/21 12:12 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Eric, > > On Sun, 04 Apr 2021 18:22:35 +0100, > Eric Auger wrote: >> >> While writting vgic v3 init sequence KVM selftests I noticed some >> relatively minor issues. This was also the opportunity to try to >> fix the issue laterly reported by Zenghui, related to the RDIST_TYPER >> last bit emulation. The final patch is a first batch of VGIC init >> sequence selftests. Of course they can be augmented with a lot more >> register access tests, but let's try to move forward incrementally ... >> >> Best Regards >> >> Eric >> >> This series can be found at: >> https://github.com/eauger/linux/tree/vgic_kvmselftests_v5 >> >> History: >> v4 -> v5: >> - rewrite the last bit detection according to Marc's >> interpretation of the spec and modify the kvm selftests >> accordingly > > Have you dropped v4's patch #1? It did seem to fix an actual issue, > didn't it? Hum no that was not my intent :-( Resending ... Eric > > Thanks, > > M. >