mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de, alex@shazbot.org,
	kbusch@kernel.org, clg@redhat.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	schnelle@linux.ibm.com, mjrosato@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/9] PCI: Avoid saving config space state if inaccessible
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:38:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <05251498-1137-4eff-811a-52a5dff3adba@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260324214051.GA1156527@bhelgaas>


On 3/24/2026 2:40 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 12:15:38PM -0700, Farhan Ali wrote:
>> The current reset process saves the device's config space state before
>> reset and restores it afterward. However errors may occur unexpectedly and
>> it may then be impossible to save config space because the device may be
>> inaccessible (e.g. DPC) or config space may be corrupted. This results in
>> saving corrupted values that get written back to the device during state
>> restoration.
> This patch only addresses the "inaccessible" part, so I'd drop the
> "config space may be corrupted" because we aren't checking for that.

Sure, I will update the commit message.


>> With a reset we want to recover/restore the device into a functional state.
>> So avoid saving the state of the config space when the device config space
>> is inaccessible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Farhan Ali <alifm@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>

Thanks for reviewing!


>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index a93084053537..373421f4b9d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -5014,6 +5014,7 @@ static void pci_dev_save_and_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>   {
>>   	const struct pci_error_handlers *err_handler =
>>   			dev->driver ? dev->driver->err_handler : NULL;
>> +	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	/*
>>   	 * dev->driver->err_handler->reset_prepare() is protected against
>> @@ -5033,6 +5034,19 @@ static void pci_dev_save_and_disable(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>   	 */
>>   	pci_set_power_state(dev, PCI_D0);
>>   
>> +	/*
>> +	 * If device's config space is inaccessible it can return ~0 for
>> +	 * any reads. Since VFs can also return ~0 for Device and Vendor ID
>> +	 * check Command and Status registers. At the very least we should
>> +	 * avoid restoring config space for device with error bits set in
>> +	 * Status register.
>> +	 */
>> +	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_COMMAND, &val);
>> +	if (PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val)) {
> Obviously this is still racy because the device may become
> inaccessible partway through saving the state, and it might be worth
> acknowledging that in the comment.  But I think this is an improvement
> over what we do now.

Yeah, makes sense. Will update the comment. How about something like:

If device's config space is inaccessible it can return ~0 for
any reads. Since VFs can also return ~0 for Device and Vendor ID
check Command and Status registers. This can still be racy as a device
can become inaccessible partway through saving the state, even after this
check.



>
> Sashiko complains about this, but I think it's mainly because of that
> last sentence of the comment that says "error bits set in Status
> register".  This patch has to do with *saving*, not restoring, so I'd
> just drop that last sentence.  FWIW, Sashiko said:
>
>    The comment indicates that we should avoid restoring config space
>    for a device with error bits set in the Status register, but the
>    code only uses PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR(val).
>
>    Since PCI_POSSIBLE_ERROR() only evaluates whether the entire 32-bit
>    value is exactly 0xFFFFFFFF (indicating complete device
>    inaccessibility), does this actually check for individual error
>    flags in the Status register?
>
>    If a device logs an error but is still accessible, val will reflect
>    those bits but will not equal 0xFFFFFFFF, causing the check to
>    evaluate to false. Should this code also check specific bits in the
>    upper 16 bits of val (such as PCI_STATUS_SIG_SYSTEM_ERROR or
>    PCI_STATUS_DETECTED_PARITY) to match the stated intention in the
>    comment?

Yup will drop the last line.

Thanks

Farhan


>
>> +		pci_warn(dev, "Device config space inaccessible\n");
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +
>>   	pci_save_state(dev);
>>   	/*
>>   	 * Disable the device by clearing the Command register, except for
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-24 22:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-16 19:15 [PATCH v11 0/9] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 1/9] PCI: Allow per function PCI slots Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 21:55   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 23:08     ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 23:20       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 2/9] s390/pci: Add architecture specific resource/bus address translation Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 23:06   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 23:47     ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 11:58     ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-03-25 17:44       ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 3/9] PCI: Avoid saving config space state if inaccessible Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 21:40   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 22:38     ` Farhan Ali [this message]
2026-03-24 22:52       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 4/9] PCI: Add additional checks for flr reset Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 22:49   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 23:22     ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 16:25     ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-25 18:40       ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 5/9] s390/pci: Update the logic for detecting passthrough device Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 16:46   ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 6/9] s390/pci: Store PCI error information for passthrough devices Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 17:01   ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-25 18:06     ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 7/9] vfio-pci/zdev: Add a device feature for error information Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 17:18   ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 8/9] vfio: Add a reset_done callback for vfio-pci driver Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 17:30   ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-16 19:15 ` [PATCH v11 9/9] vfio: Remove the pcie check for VFIO_PCI_ERR_IRQ_INDEX Farhan Ali
2026-03-24 21:26   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 22:30     ` Farhan Ali
2026-03-25 17:50     ` Alex Williamson
2026-03-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v11 0/9] Error recovery for vfio-pci devices on s390x Farhan Ali

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=05251498-1137-4eff-811a-52a5dff3adba@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=alifm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@shazbot.org \
    --cc=clg@redhat.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®