mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chih Kai Hsu <hsu.chih.kai@realtek.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	nic_swsd <nic_swsd@realtek.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"bjorn@mork.no" <bjorn@mork.no>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"mail@birger-koblitz.de" <mail@birger-koblitz.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v7 05/10] r8152: fix up and down register settings for RTL8156/8156B/8157/8159
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:08:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0595476b3b8f4aefa6f9eb990b17c7d0@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021005212.1254979-1-kuba@kernel.org>

On Wednesday, October 21, 2026 8:52 AM, Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this email has
> considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> r8152: fix up and down register settings for RTL8156/8156B/8157/8159
> 
> This commit corrects several up/down and OOB register settings for the
> RTL8156, RTL8156B, RTL8157 and RTL8159 chips, following the earlier
> per-generation split of the up/down callbacks. It changes the PLA_RCR1,
> USB_SPEED_OPTION, Clear_SDR, PLA_BDC_CR/PLA_OOB_CTRL and OOB
> PLA_RMS/PLA_MTPS settings, and drops PLA_MCU_SPDWN_EN handling from
> rtl8157_up()/rtl8157_down().
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c index
> > b245b63fb6aaf..045460a35f383 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/r8152.c
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -6938,8 +6937,18 @@ static void r8156_enter_oob(struct r8152 *tp)
> >       rtl_disable(tp);
> >       rtl_reset_bmu(tp);
> >
> > -     ocp_write_word(tp, MCU_TYPE_PLA, PLA_RMS, 1522);
> > -     ocp_write_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_PLA, PLA_MTPS, MTPS_DEFAULT);
> > +     switch (tp->version) {
> > +     case RTL_VER_16:
> > +     case RTL_VER_17_QFN68:
> > +     case RTL_VER_17_QFN100:
> 
> [Severity: Medium]
> This patch has three Fixes: tags:
> 
>   Fixes: 195aae321c82 ("r8152: support new chips")
>   Fixes: fd3c7d080df5 ("r8152: Add support for the RTL8157 hardware")
>   Fixes: ad2a55b63b41 ("r8152: Add support for the RTL8159 chip")
> 
> Will it apply and build on the trees those tags point to?
> 
> RTL_VER_17_QFN68 and RTL_VER_17_QFN100 come from an earlier patch in
> this series, "r8152: split RTL_VER_17 into QFN68 and QFN100 package
> variants".
> Before that patch the enum only has RTL_VER_17.
> 
> rtl8157_up() and rtl8157_down() also only exist after "r8152: split
> rtl8156_enable/up/down into per-generation functions", which is described as
> no functional change. Before that patch there is one shared
> rtl8156_up() with tp->version >= RTL_VER_16 and tp->version < RTL_VER_16
> checks.
> 
> So a stable backport would either conflict or need both non-fix patches as
> prerequisites. One of them is the package detection change, which makes an
> unrecognised PLA_PKG_DET value fall back to RTL_VER_UNKNOWN.
> 
> Could these fixes go to net separately, written against the pre-refactor code? Or
> could the commit message at least name the prerequisites?

I will reorder the series so the fixes come first, written against the pre-refactor code, 
with the refactor rebased on top.

> 
> > +             ocp_write_word(tp, MCU_TYPE_PLA, PLA_RMS, 1526);
> > +             ocp_write_byte(tp, MCU_TYPE_PLA, PLA_MTPS, 10 * 1024 /
> 64);
> > +             break;
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > @@ -6997,6 +7008,11 @@ static void rtl8157_up(struct r8152 *tp)
> >       }
> >
> >       r8153_aldps_en(tp, true);
> > +
> > +     /* Enable Clear_SDR */
> > +     ocp_byte_set_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, 0xd378, BIT(7));
> > +     /* Clear SDR bit */
> > +     ocp_word_clr_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, 0xcd06, BIT(15));
> >  }
> 
> [Severity: High]
> The commit message says:
> 
>   - RTL8156B (VER_13/15) need Clear_SDR enabled on up, which nothing
>     ever did for them.
> 
> Is the RTL8156B part missing from this patch? These are the only Clear_SDR
> writes the patch adds. rtl8157_up() is only used for RTL_VER_16,
> RTL_VER_17_QFN68 and RTL_VER_17_QFN100.
> 
> In rtl_ops_init(), RTL_VER_13 and RTL_VER_15 are bound to rtl8156_up():
> 
>         case RTL_VER_12:
>         case RTL_VER_13:
>                 tp->support_2500full    = 1;
>                 fallthrough;
>         case RTL_VER_15:
>                 ...
>                 ops->up                 = rtl8156_up;
> 
> This patch does not change rtl8156_up(), and it still writes no Clear_SDR
> register:
> 
>         r8156_exit_oob(tp);
> 
>         ocp_word_clr_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_PLA, PLA_MAC_PWR_CTRL3,
> PLA_MCU_SPDWN_EN);
> 
>         ocp_word_clr_bits(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_SPEED_OPTION,
>                           RG_PWRDN_EN | ALL_SPEED_OFF);
> 
>         ocp_write_dword(tp, MCU_TYPE_USB, USB_RX_BUF_TH,
> 0x00600400);
>         ...
>         r8153_aldps_en(tp, true);
>         r8153_u2p3en(tp, true);
> 
> So every open or resume on an RTL8156B goes through ops->up ->
> rtl8156_up() without the Clear_SDR enable. The later patches in the series don't
> add it to rtl8156_up() either.
> 
> Should rtl8156_up() get the RTL8156B Clear_SDR writes under an
> RTL_VER_13/RTL_VER_15 check, or should this bullet come out of the commit
> message? The 0xd378/0xcd06 writes used for RTL8157/8159 can't be assumed
> to apply to RTL8156B.

I accidentally dropped the corresponding code; I will add it back.

Best Regards,
Chih-Kai

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-14  8:18 [PATCH net-next v7 00/10] r8152: refactor and extend RTL8157/8159 support Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:18 ` [PATCH net-next v7 01/10] r8152: split r8156_init by generation and factor out wait_autoload_done Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-21  0:52   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-22  7:55     ` Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:18 ` [PATCH net-next v7 02/10] r8152: add new init writes for RTL8156/8156B/8157/8159 Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:18 ` [PATCH net-next v7 03/10] r8152: split RTL_VER_17 into QFN68 and QFN100 package variants Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:18 ` [PATCH net-next v7 04/10] r8152: split rtl8156_enable/up/down into per-generation functions Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:18 ` [PATCH net-next v7 05/10] r8152: fix up and down register settings for RTL8156/8156B/8157/8159 Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-21  0:52   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-22  8:08     ` Chih Kai Hsu [this message]
2026-10-14  8:19 ` [PATCH net-next v7 06/10] r8152: split r8157_hw_phy_cfg into RTL8157 and RTL8159 variants Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:19 ` [PATCH net-next v7 07/10] r8152: add rtl8157_unload and rtl8157_change_mtu Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:19 ` [PATCH net-next v7 08/10] r8152: add TGPHY register access for RTL8157 and RTL8159 Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-21  0:52   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-22 11:30     ` Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:19 ` [PATCH net-next v7 09/10] r8152: extract rtl_fc_pause_pkt_en() and apply it to RTL8156/8157/8159 Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:19 ` [PATCH net-next v7 10/10] r8152: enable UPS for RTL8157 and RTL8159 QFN68 Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-21  0:52   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-10-22 12:11     ` Chih Kai Hsu
2026-10-14  8:25 ` [PATCH net-next v7 00/10] r8152: refactor and extend RTL8157/8159 support netdev-bot+sinfo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0595476b3b8f4aefa6f9eb990b17c7d0@realtek.com \
    --to=hsu.chih.kai@realtek.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bjorn@mork.no \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@birger-koblitz.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®