From: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Ananthu C V <ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com,
Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: fix schedutil not returning to non-boost freq when boost is disabled
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 17:15:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <05c00750-7fc2-49d4-9336-7beb33fd9380@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260908-schedutil-boost-frequency-handling-v2-2-25312a713699@oss.qualcomm.com>
Hi Ananthu,
On 9/8/2026 4:30 PM, Ananthu C V wrote:
> Commit 538b0188da46 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Set cpuinfo.max_freq directly if
> max boost is known") introduced a guard for cpuinfo max updates to only
> increase, to preserve driver-set values above the freq table maximum,
> causing cpuinfo max to be stuck at boost frequency even when boost is
> disabled.
>
> Unconditionally track the highest non-boost frequency (max_base_freq)
> in the freq table. When a freq table is available, use max_table_freq/
> max_base_freq instead of cpuinfo->max_freq to control boost values, so
> the value can decrease again when boost is disabled.
This issue does not appear to be limited to schedutil, so the subject
seems too restrictive.
>
> Fixes: 538b0188da46 ("cpufreq: ACPI: Set cpuinfo.max_freq directly if max boost is known")
I already commented on the Fixes: tag in v1.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/3a20b69e-b072-4723-925f-514d8162e259@oss.qualcomm.com/#t
IMO it should be: 6e39ba4e5a82 ("cpufreq: Add boost_freq_req QoS
request")
Could you please comment on this?
> Signed-off-by: Ananthu C V <ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 5 +++++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 0d0df986fa3d..a13e72711597 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static ssize_t show_local_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
>
> static int policy_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool enable)
> {
> + unsigned int max_freq;
> int ret;
>
> if (policy->boost_enabled == enable)
> @@ -587,7 +588,18 @@ static int policy_set_boost(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, bool enable)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - ret = freq_qos_update_request(&policy->boost_freq_req, policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> + if (policy->freq_table) {
acpi-cpufreq has a freq table but never sets CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ, so
max_table_freq == max_base_freq == _PSS P0 here, and the real boost
ceiling kept in cpuinfo.max_freq is lost. It seems that the condition
needs to be "does the freq table list boost frequencies" rather than "is
there a freq table" — e.g. recorded during the table scan, the same way
boost_supported is derived from the flags in
cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort(). And then:
if (policy->cpuinfo.boost_in_table) {
xxx;
}
> + max_freq = enable ? policy->cpuinfo.max_table_freq :
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_base_freq;
> +
> + if (!max_freq)
> + /* when the freq table contains only boost frequencies */
> + max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_table_freq;
> + } else {
> + max_freq = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> + }
> +
> + ret = freq_qos_update_request(&policy->boost_freq_req, max_freq);
> if (ret < 0) {
> policy->boost_enabled = !policy->boost_enabled;
> cpufreq_driver->set_boost(policy, policy->boost_enabled);
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> index 4984142dc08a..7e183e16162d 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> unsigned int min_freq = ~0;
> unsigned int max_freq = 0;
> unsigned int max_table_freq = 0;
> + unsigned int max_base_freq = 0;
> unsigned int freq, i;
>
> cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry_idx(pos, table, i) {
> @@ -42,6 +43,9 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> if (freq > max_table_freq)
> max_table_freq = freq;
>
> + if (!(pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ) && freq > max_base_freq)
> + max_base_freq = freq;
> +
> if ((!cpufreq_boost_enabled() || !policy->boost_enabled)
> && (pos->flags & CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ))
> continue;
> @@ -62,6 +66,7 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = max_freq;
>
> policy->cpuinfo.max_table_freq = max_table_freq;
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_base_freq = max_base_freq;
>
> if (min_freq == ~0)
> return -EINVAL;
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 3f3b1380251a..419c71ccff7c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct cpufreq_cpuinfo {
> unsigned int max_freq;
> unsigned int min_freq;
> unsigned int max_table_freq; /* Highest valid frequency in the table */
> + unsigned int max_base_freq; /* Highest non-boost frequency in the table */
>
> /* in 10^(-9) s = nanoseconds */
> unsigned int transition_latency;
>
--
Thx and BRs,
Zhongqiu Han
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-08 8:30 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/cpufreq: fix schedutil's boost frequency handling Ananthu C V
2026-09-08 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arch_topology: seed capacity_freq_ref with boost-aware max freq Ananthu C V
2026-09-15 7:58 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-17 18:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-17 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-18 6:23 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-18 12:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-18 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-18 13:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki (Intel)
2026-09-18 13:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-09-21 10:27 ` Ananthu C V
2026-09-08 8:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpufreq: fix schedutil not returning to non-boost freq when boost is disabled Ananthu C V
2026-09-18 9:15 ` Zhongqiu Han [this message]
2026-09-21 10:34 ` Ananthu C V
2026-09-22 13:39 ` Zhongqiu Han
2026-09-08 10:03 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/cpufreq: fix schedutil's boost frequency handling Ananthu C V
2026-09-14 16:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-09-17 16:05 ` Oleg Keri
2026-09-21 11:57 ` Ananthu C V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=05c00750-7fc2-49d4-9336-7beb33fd9380@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=zhongqiu.han@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ananthu.cv@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sibi.sankar@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®