From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Frank van der Linden <fvdl@google.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org,
Mohini Narkhede <mohini.narkhede@intel.com>,
Pooja Jain <pooja.jain@intel.com>,
Doug Nelson <doug.nelson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: Fix usemap overrun on nodes with multiple ranges
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 13:32:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0611C182-4A76-4751-A04B-0849EC31DAD3@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029212137.3141875-1-tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
> On Oct 30, 2026, at 05:21, Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> sparse_init_nid() allocates one usemap slot (struct mem_section_usage)
> per present section in [pnum_begin, pnum_end), and
> sparse_init_early_section() hands them out in order, with a BUG_ON() when
> they run out. hugetlb_vmemmap_init_early(nid) however initializes the
> sections of every bootmem gigantic page on the node, including pages
> outside the range being initialized. If a node's memory is split into
> more than one range, sparse_init() calls sparse_init_nid() once per range,
> and this takes more slots than were allocated. The same happens if a
> gigantic page straddles a node boundary.
>
> For example, with this SRAT layout every node has a small range below 4G
> and a large range above 4G:
>
> Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x2fffffff] 768 MB (low)
> Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0x80cfffffff] (high)
> Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x30000000-0x5fffffff] 768 MB (low)
> ...
>
> In 128 MB memory sections (x86_64 SECTION_SIZE_BITS = 27), node 0's low
> range is sections 0x00-0x05 (6 present sections) and its high range is
> sections 0x20-0x1019. The low ranges of the other nodes are 4 or 6
> sections, all smaller than the 8 sections of a 1G page.
>
> Node 0's first range has 6 sections, so 6 slots. With "hugepagesz=1G
> hugepages=400", hugetlb_vmemmap_init_early(0) then initializes node 0's
> 1G page at 0x67c0000000 (sections 0xcf8-0xcff, in its high range), and
> the 7th section hits the BUG_ON() (seen on v7.2.6):
>
> kernel BUG at mm/sparse.c:268!
> RIP: 0010:sparse_init_early_section+0x9f/0xb0
> RAX: 0000000000200000 RBX: 0000000000000cfe RCX: 0000000000000020
> RDX: 0000000000000cfe RSI: ffd7e1d09fc00000 RDI: ff252cb28ffb3f50
> R10: ff252cb28ffb3d40 R13: 0000000000000d00
> Call Trace:
> hugetlb_vmemmap_init_early+0xe1/0x140
> sparse_init_nid+0x56/0x370
> sparse_init+0x192/0x2b0
> free_area_init+0x7f/0x690
> start_kernel+0x64/0x540
>
> Here RDX is the section number, and R10/RDI are 6 slots apart: the start
> of the usemap buffer and its current position, which is the end.
A detailed analysis.
>
> Pass the section range to hugetlb_vmemmap_init_early() and only pre-HVO a
> page whose sections are all present and within it. Ranges are disjoint,
> so each page is handled once, in its own range.
>
> Skipped pages are not marked HUGE_BOOTMEM_HVO. Their sections get a
> regular memmap from sparse_init_nid(), and the pages are optimized later
> by hugetlb_vmemmap_optimize_bootmem_folios().
Thanks for fixing this.
However, the master branch has already switched to section-based vmemmap
optimization, it has been already fixed. So this fix should target the
stable kernels (6.18, 7.2 and 7.3).
The change LGTM. So:
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-29 21:21 Tim Chen
2026-10-30 5:32 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2026-10-30 8:58 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0611C182-4A76-4751-A04B-0849EC31DAD3@linux.dev \
--to=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=doug.nelson@intel.com \
--cc=fvdl@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mohini.narkhede@intel.com \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pooja.jain@intel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®