From: Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 03:09:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <06376010-5DED-49AA-9494-A9546567E7CA@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47749B61-5924-4E56-9931-77B0CFC0AAA0@gmail.com>
24 нояб. 2014 г., в 23:05, Alexander Kochetkov <al.kochet@gmail.com> написал(а):
> Something (u-boot, may be) leave the bus in the wrong state.
> Really strange.
Actually something wrong with i2c-pullups on i2c.1 bus on fault boards.
May be these are boards without pull-ups?
All beagles doesn't have internal pull-ups on i2c.1 since u-boot 2011.x.
Here is the bug in the u-boot related to beagle:
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot.git;a=commit;h=04e2a13336f0e507ef416bbede3be92b79c46594
Yes, I made fix, but keep that in mind.
For example one of the boards (omap3-beagle):
http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-beagle/job/next/kernel/next-20141124/defconfig/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/
http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-beagle,legacy/job/next/kernel/next-20141124/defconfig/arm-omap2plus_defconfig/
http://status.armcloud.us/boot/omap3-beagle/job/next/kernel/next-20141124/defconfig/arm-multi_v7_defconfig/
has following warning message in the u-boot log:
> U-Boot 2014.07 (Aug 21 2014 - 11:03:05)
>
> OMAP3530-GP ES3.0, CPU-OPP2, L3-165MHz, Max CPU Clock 600 MHz
> OMAP3 Beagle board + LPDDR/NAND
> ....
> Beagle Rev C1/C2/C3
> Timed out in wait_for_event: status=1000
> Check if pads/pull-ups of bus 1 are properly configured
Also beagle schematic has following log entry for A3:
4. Added optional pullup resistors on I2C2_SCL and I2C_SDA into the layout.
Is the fault beagle is pre A3 revision?
I can't tell anything about second one board (omap3-overo-tobi), because I could not get it schematic.
And how you have i2c.1 working without pull-ups I don't know.
Alexander.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-25 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-20 21:28 [RFC 0/4] i2c: omap: patch series related to multimaster mode Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-20 21:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] i2c: omap: cleanup register definitions Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-21 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-20 21:28 ` [PATCH 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-21 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-22 13:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-22 14:06 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 18:02 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-23 4:43 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-23 13:18 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-24 19:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-24 19:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-20 21:28 ` [PATCH 3/4] i2c: omap: don't reset controller if Arbitration Lost detected Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-21 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-21 18:11 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-21 22:51 ` [PATCH v2 " Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 1:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-20 21:28 ` [PATCH 4/4] i2c: omap: add notes related to i2c multimaster mode Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-21 16:08 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] i2c: omap: patch series related to " Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: omap: cleanup register definitions Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] i2c: omap: implement workaround for handling invalid BB-bit values Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-24 19:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-24 19:10 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-11-24 19:13 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-24 19:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-24 19:39 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-24 19:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-24 20:05 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-25 0:09 ` Alexander Kochetkov [this message]
2014-11-25 15:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-24 21:08 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-26 22:30 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-24 20:33 ` [PATCH] omap: i2c: don't check bus state IP rev3.3 and earlier Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-24 21:08 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-24 22:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-25 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-11-25 14:38 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-25 19:13 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-26 19:26 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-26 21:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-25 19:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-26 19:05 ` [RFC] i2c: omap: TEST: do IP reset during probe Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-26 21:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2014-11-28 22:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-28 23:25 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-29 22:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-11-29 2:14 ` Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] i2c: omap: don't reset controller if Arbitration Lost detected Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 19:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] i2c: omap: add notes related to i2c multimaster mode Alexander Kochetkov
2014-11-22 21:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] i2c: omap: patch series related to " Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=06376010-5DED-49AA-9494-A9546567E7CA@gmail.com \
--to=al.kochet@gmail.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®