RE: [PATCH 1/3] Fix ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line

[David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>]

From: Alex Williamson
> Sent: 15 May 2017 04:21
...
> > >  	/* Find end of list, sew whole thing into vi->rq.pages. */
> > > -	for (end = page; end->private; end = (struct page *)end->private);
> > > +	for (end = page; end->private; end = (struct page *)end->private)
> > > +		;
> 
> FWIW, I generally like to put a comment on the next line to make it
> abundantly clear that there's nothing in the body of the loop, it's
> also more aesthetically pleasing than a semi-colon on the line by
> itself, ex. /* Nothing */;  It's just too easy to misinterpret the
> loop otherwise, especially without gratuitous white space.  Thanks,

My preference is to put 'continue;' on a line by itself.
Or even move the termination condition into the loop:
	for (end = page;; end = (struct page *)end->private)
		if (!end->private)
			break;

(oh, is that cast needed??)

	David