From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BAA814265; Fri, 31 May 2024 02:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717123535; cv=none; b=XAdOEoUR6xFF80GJEM2haPji7H8r2JMi4tph53dYZgSkqVgJqE1ldvHuL/3PrEWrxMip+yzV4kZpOokMI6SiQju+WVOBgLQ4LtryCe/46fc5QEwzWaN6NXkndJq9vI28TAxCnK/DksQeMvF8C3QCyLiyc0ZpqgJJ9UKeptDJjn4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717123535; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ogjFpFI1mY9EkB7BS5con78jBONtmxi3wYyr48grF7c=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=CWlQRPsqXK/vzAJXXtOdaUKTifanEKjz5vu7AhYO1pKeDF7qJIfjFi7GxtaPt4uQ6Is3EfCDgDonBP6FkvXZmO14H5pbseqTxvD95kbuqttiQsDgq4A22GxnBZGuS+Dw6iF0sgwT9LtpBXJ5vZ0z+tnGa6N9hsPURfAQEVeX6uY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=SNAYiZtN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="SNAYiZtN" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1717123530; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Q5Xxa+1pfjc83KgBzGxQW/9sLaAlfMtTgcdj5otYUxQ=; b=SNAYiZtNgZqRk9A1Opklu3S3DISvQzvdiQsIwR+hxLJwn3EvkM1U0oc4W5FDaYKz5KfM6c E/QhLW+EYIHy0+wN3Lk34YIaYl0fnzuTr+hGczp5TBmFjlsafAnBHmjeDmQ30NVFhL6DUa mTcPkotcL1rEazPuEg8KQ44s8AsVIdwQXZbiwZqJba9gbqT7RvVwROCJAVVi2fQ5Aa/1vs X0+mjKUw+xJyVBYMhvgDxVoihnSyX7qUMbEe57qOJ7dNHF/rNGV5pD74o8NdfuMXhGNH5m udPdca5v8xsOKerjRU+/jdYjE1W8zgyRmv2a9rqiXHxil18UeXtkJv4VvAGx4w== Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 04:45:28 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Diederik de Haas Cc: Alexey Charkov , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, heiko@sntech.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, quentin.schulz@cherry.de, wens@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: Make preparations for per-RK3588-variant OPPs In-Reply-To: <511137f077495007f467d5927f42f85d@manjaro.org> References: <673dcf47596e7bc8ba065034e339bb1bbf9cdcb0.1716948159.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <9996796.SDjBYy7pSV@bagend> <511137f077495007f467d5927f42f85d@manjaro.org> Message-ID: <06452ce330f0a712e4d765475c6cbc8b@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-05-29 13:33, Dragan Simic wrote: > On 2024-05-29 13:09, Diederik de Haas wrote: >> On Wednesday, 29 May 2024 11:57:45 CEST Alexey Charkov wrote: [...] >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588.dtsi | 414 +-- >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588j.dtsi | 6 +- >>> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi | 2671 +---------------- >>> >>> Rename detection didn't do a particularly great job here - wonder if >>> we can do anything about it to minimize the patch size and ensure >>> that >>> the change history is preserved for git blame... >> >> +1 >> The diff does look awfully big for a rename operation, which was >> supposed to >> (also only) "modify ... a bit". > > I also don't like the size of the patch. I just tried playing with > specifying different values for the --find-renames and --find-copies > options, but with no good results. I'll have a look into the Git > source later, to see what's actually going on with those options. Yay, --break-rewrites makes the diff extremely compact. :) [1] [1] https://git-scm.com/docs/git-diff#Documentation/git-diff.txt--Bltngtltmgt