From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>,
Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>,
Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
Mykyta Yatsenko <mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v6 1/4] bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:44:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0646cb86-45dc-42bc-a381-07688b822acc@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZQo9vidTkr9kORbft9Lhx56JJujWQit40xem40TjSS1A@mail.gmail.com>
On 2026/7/28 7:01, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2026 at 12:19 AM Pu Lehui <pulehui@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
>>
>> In bpf_netns_link_update_prog, the checks for old_prog and prog type
>> are currently performed locklessly before acquiring netns_bpf_mutex.
>> This creates a race condition that can lead to a UAF issue.
>>
>> If two threads concurrently execute BPF_LINK_UPDATE on the same netns
>> link, the following execution path can trigger a UAF:
>>
>> CPU0 CPU1
>> bpf_netns_link_update_prog
>> if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
>> return -EPERM;
>> bpf_netns_link_update_prog
>> if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
>> ...
>> old_prog = xchg(&link->prog, new_prog);
>> bpf_prog_put(old_prog);
>> if (new_prog->type != link->prog->type) <-- trigger UAF
>>
>> Fix this by moving the old_prog and prog->type checks inside the
>> netns_bpf_mutex critical section.
>>
>> Fixes: 7f045a49fee0 ("bpf: Add link-based BPF program attachment to network namespace")
>> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>
> the change is good, all other link types do take lock first and then
> do all the checking, netns is the only oddball, but see implementation
> nit below
>
>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c b/kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c
>> index 25f30f9edaef..9fc62db1441c 100644
>> --- a/kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c
>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/net_namespace.c
>> @@ -171,13 +171,17 @@ static int bpf_netns_link_update_prog(struct bpf_link *link,
>> struct net *net;
>> int idx, ret;
>>
>> - if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog)
>> - return -EPERM;
>> - if (new_prog->type != link->prog->type)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> mutex_lock(&netns_bpf_mutex);
>>
>> + if (old_prog && old_prog != link->prog) {
>> + ret = -EPERM;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>> + }
>> + if (new_prog->type != link->prog->type) {
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto out_unlock;
>
> can we use guard() and avoid all the goto jumping?
ok, will update next
>
> pw-bot: cr
>
>
>> + }
>> +
>> net = net_link->net;
>> if (!net || !check_net(net)) {
>> /* Link auto-detached or netns dying */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-22 7:23 [PATCH bpf v6 0/4] Fixes for bpf link update Pu Lehui
2026-07-22 7:23 ` [PATCH bpf v6 1/4] bpf: Fix potential UAF in bpf_netns_link_update_prog Pu Lehui
2026-07-27 23:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-28 1:44 ` Pu Lehui [this message]
2026-07-22 7:23 ` [PATCH bpf v6 2/4] bpf: Fix UAF due to missing link type check in mprog Pu Lehui
2026-07-22 16:25 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-23 3:14 ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-28 1:56 ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-28 5:50 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-07-22 7:23 ` [PATCH bpf v6 3/4] bpf: Fix potential UAF when reading bpf link info Pu Lehui
2026-07-27 23:15 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-28 1:45 ` Pu Lehui
2026-07-22 7:23 ` [PATCH bpf v6 4/4] bpf, cgroup: Fix storage null-ptr-deref after replacing prog Pu Lehui
2026-07-27 23:17 ` [PATCH bpf v6 0/4] Fixes for bpf link update Andrii Nakryiko
2026-07-28 1:54 ` Pu Lehui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0646cb86-45dc-42bc-a381-07688b822acc@huawei.com \
--to=pulehui@huawei.com \
--cc=ameryhung@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com \
--cc=pulehui@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®