Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: core: Rework obtaining a rproc from a DT phandle

[Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com>]

+Suman,

On 8/10/2016 10:15 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 19 Jul 08:49 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
>
>> In this patch we;
>>  - Use a subsystem generic phandle to obtain an rproc
>>    - We have to support TI's bespoke version for the time being
>>  - Convert wkup_m3_ipc driver to new API
>>  - Rename the call to be more like other, similar OF calls
>>  - Move feature-not-enabled inline stub to the headers
>>  - Strip out duplicate code by calling into of_get_rproc_by_index()
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 41 ++++++++----------------------------
>>  drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c         | 14 +++---------
>>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++--
>>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
> [..]
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c b/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
>> index 8823cc8..15481f3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/wkup_m3_ipc.c
>> @@ -385,7 +385,6 @@ static int wkup_m3_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>  	int irq, ret;
>> -	phandle rproc_phandle;
>>  	struct rproc *m3_rproc;
>>  	struct resource *res;
>>  	struct task_struct *task;
>> @@ -430,16 +429,9 @@ static int wkup_m3_ipc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  		return PTR_ERR(m3_ipc->mbox);
>>  	}
>>
>> -	if (of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "ti,rproc", &rproc_phandle)) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get rproc phandle\n");
>> -		ret = -ENODEV;
>> -		goto err_free_mbox;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	m3_rproc = rproc_get_by_phandle(rproc_phandle);
>> -	if (!m3_rproc) {
>> -		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get rproc handle\n");
>> -		ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
>> +	m3_rproc = of_get_rproc_by_phandle(dev->of_node);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(m3_rproc)) {
>> +		ret = PTR_ERR(m3_rproc);
>>  		goto err_free_mbox;
>>  	}
>>
>
> Santosh, do you have any objections to me merging this?
>
This looks ok to me but I have not been merdging the remote
proc code. Looping Suman who IIRC, was looking at it along
with Ohad.

> of_get_rproc_by_phandle() will fall back and attempt to acquire the
> handle from ti,rproc if the generic "rprocs" property doesn't exist.
>

Suman,
Can you please check this series and see if you can line this up ?
Am not sure if Ohad still maintaining it.

Regards,
Santosh