From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2866DC433F5 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0742A610A1 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 23:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231196AbhIUXyx (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:54:53 -0400 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:45008 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229824AbhIUXyw (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 19:54:52 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18LNrCqK081573; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1632268392; bh=jjUeDPDF1YHObUoZjxKJB2Gi2KKuOAOryz8ngfflF1k=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=vaWUJLsqSa2U6Ex5C4K1z8Rcpto4+UQoghsms0QR9Srx3t42smUFlOIQzuk30fa1n Svi8JX9+lghCPTDwAciVzlkpKbPGUD3HPloJ/BSwZetVVnF3yAQVEbEJpADO8TL97o UN0Ci6qtaVMQPxq9ZmuzI9i1sa668tgLSNuwms5Q= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 18LNrCOZ011409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE113.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2308.14 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Received: from [10.250.37.219] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18LNrC4q119274; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 Subject: Re: beaglebone black boot failure Linux v5.15.rc1 To: Robert Nelson CC: Drew Fustini , Tony Lindgren , Matti Vaittinen , Grygorii Strashko , "Vaittinen, Matti" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , Paul Barker , Peter Ujfalusi , =?UTF-8?Q?Beno=c3=aet_Cousson?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <120a0ca4-28c7-5a7b-f1ab-2015c8817bda@fi.rohmeurope.com> <0679a5bb-88d1-077d-6107-d5f88ef60dbf@fi.rohmeurope.com> <8f3963ca-ff09-b876-ae9e-433add242de2@ti.com> <331ab81e-cd42-7e9b-617a-fde4c773c07a@ti.com> <615b6fec-6c62-4a97-6d0c-d2e5a5d1ccb2@fi.rohmeurope.com> <36785ccf-57b4-eaf1-cfc0-b024857f7694@gmail.com> <40077cea-1f5e-de67-58dd-7fae0f63678d@ti.com> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <066d9a7e-89c2-b8b5-b2cd-4993513f5a64@ti.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:53:12 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 9/21/21 5:00 PM, Robert Nelson wrote: > On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 4:54 PM Suman Anna wrote: >> >> On 9/21/21 3:29 PM, Drew Fustini wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 9:09 AM Suman Anna wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Matti, Tony, >>>> >>>> On 9/21/21 2:47 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>>>> * Matti Vaittinen [210920 08:23]: >>>>>> Finally, adding the udelay(100); (as Tony suggested) at the end of the >>>>>> omap_reset_deassert() did make the oops go away even when pruss_tm was >>>>>> enabled. I don't know what would be a proper fix though. >>>> >>>> I have been able to boot v5.15-rc1 just fine on my BBB without any additional >>>> changes [1]. >>>> >>>> May I ask what is your BBB board version? My board is rev.A5C. >>> >>> That rev is quite old [1]. Would you be able to try a Rev C? It has >>> been in production since around 2014 with the move from 2GB to 4GB >>> eMMC. >> >> I don't have any rev.C boards handy to try. >> >> I am curious to see if there is some correlation between failures and board >> versions. I see that there is a minor processor change to AM3358 from rev.B >> onwards compared to the AM3359 that I would have on my board. PRU-ICSS IP would >> be present and supported on both though. > > Rev B vs Rev C shouldn't matter.. I don't think I even have a Rev > "B".. A6A, B, to C* was done very quickly at CIrcuitCo at that time.. > > https://elinux.org/Beagleboard:BeagleBoneBlack#Revision_B > > "This version moves to the AM3358BZCZ100 processor as we are no longer > able to get the limited production version of the AM3359AZCZ100." > > I'm assuming the AM3358 had the pru enabled.. Yes, PRU-ICSS is present on AM3356 and above. regards Suman