From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC91C4332F for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:50:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234961AbiLMJuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:50:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234865AbiLMJuY (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 04:50:24 -0500 Received: from madras.collabora.co.uk (madras.collabora.co.uk [46.235.227.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9548F15FF6 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 01:50:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by madras.collabora.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 135BA6602C32; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 09:50:21 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1670925021; bh=HS72oKm63w2LMEbxOfImNuaKAF4fpLQ7wU9oXHA4roE=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=RtHJ6ooTaXZdj05uQbT7acXUw89mJS6ITx6Q1+RL8+PauvSKj0GnkXuMiS7D2GW/n Ff0q+hMsMGz0Ud71EVrgO2QJmM/VOMABPSe2ZB/1W5kYhIkVSmGrkh9wBBHgILk38/ qtng7/RaKsmJkDUHFG6kJTTGJPQHA5NEtSSwtrlM2Uw4vdpC76y7t0NQYBzz+D+YgJ wSq1CPLm+CIP6yUNM5UZOcxrimnq23attlWv+wrqCZJfAcLTi8DI9W+jiOCh33cN4g S2nPNphL6f5JxOXVLkqpK9FM0Rxqu+IMQR7yzOuCJnVq9qRfjAtHTBE+7f8t9c1xar RyPqsRiqi7+bw== Message-ID: <0670a966-2449-977d-a791-4b1c4478524b@collabora.com> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:50:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] soc: mediatek: mutex: Drop empty platform remove function Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine-K=c3=b6nig?= Cc: Matthias Brugger , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de References: <20221212222549.3779846-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20221212222549.3779846-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno In-Reply-To: <20221212222549.3779846-3-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Il 12/12/22 23:25, Uwe Kleine-König ha scritto: > A remove callback just returning 0 is equivalent to no remove callback > at all. So drop the useless function. > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König Totally agree. Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno